Friday, July 31, 2009

she can cook for me anytime

This is the movie-tie-in edition of the book, which is the version I have.

Title: Julie & Julia:

Author: Julie Powell

Summary: Julie is a late-twenty-something New Yorker with a loving husband, a horrible apartment, and a job as a government drone.  When she hits her mid-life crisis a bit early, she embarks on a year-long project: to cook her way through Julia Child’s famous cookbook “Mastering the Art of French Cooking” vol.1.  Julie tells the story of that year– and the insanity that ensues.

Ok– my summary doesn’t nearly do the book justice.  It is a memoir (which is quite a departure for my reading) that incorporates humor, food, work stress, family, insane self-imposed projects, and moving. It also wasn’t what I was expecting.  I was disappointed in the first few chapters; I had expected it to be a collection of her blog entries, not a whole story.  I’m a Johnny-come-lately to this whole thing, and I hadn’t read Julie’s original blog (I have now– it’s still up). 

Soon, though, I came to appreciate the fact that there was a whole story here.   I love Julie as a narrator!  Her prose is friendly and comfortable, like she’s talking on the phone to you, telling you all about her day.  Sometimes there’s more detail that you really care about, and sometimes you want to interrupt her and make her go back and tell you more about something– she usually does eventually.  Also, her narrative tone changes to match her mood at a given point in the story (a trick many writers never quite accomplish). 

So, for example, when their pipes have been frozen for three days, and her husband is about to put into practice some ill-advised scheme for heating their drafty apartment, but Julie still has to cook in order to meet her self-imposed deadline, we are treated to passages like this one:

“He gets an idea in his head, but you still have much work to do, and besides you haven’t bathed in three days, so you put him off by asking him to make you a gimlet.  Chop up some potatoes and carrots and turnips.  If you’re feeling patient, you can carve the vegetables up into beautiful smooth round shapes.  Does it make a difference?  I wouldn’t know; I’m not patient.  Also peel some pearl onions.  If you have no water but the melted oily gray snow you scooped up from the sidewalk into your cooler (a cooler that will now have to be disinfected with lye), just so you could flush the toilet, you’ll have to peel them the hard way, without parboiling them first.  You might need another gimlet for that.”  (213-214)

And so on.

I really, really enjoyed reading this book.  Now, not all of the story is hysterically funny.  Some chapters are poignant, and a good deal of text is given over to the actual preparation of the dishes and how Julie altered them for her kitchen.  If you follow what Julie did, you could make most of the recipes yourself (as I did with the potato & leek soup yesterday). 

Julie’s having such a distinctive narrative voice means that there is definitely a target audience for this memoir– the mid-twenties (ok, closer to 30 than 20, but I’m not in denial at all) woman.  I think older people might not sympathize quite as much with her personality or her housekeeping (or lack thereof).   Younger folks just haven’t hit that existential point yet which makes a person say, “I need to do this crazy thing.”  Here’s the test: read pages 332 & 333 (in the Little Brown ed).  If you could imagine something similiar happening in your house, then you will enjoy Julie.  If you think, “How disgusting!  How can people live like that?”  Then, she may not be the girl for you. 

Julie’s  definately for me.  Perhaps because I’m about Julie’s age (at the time) and have also hit that realization that I’ve realistically gotten just about as far as I’m going to go (without making all sorts of super-drastic changes), so I’d better get used to that idea.  Maybe because I know in my heart that I will never have a floor that is clean enough to eat from.    Maybe because I love to cook and bake, but always end up with flour in my hair.   Whatever it is, I think I’ve found a kindred spirit in Julie. 

I’m looking forward to the movie, too.  It seems it will incoporate Julia Child’s personal story more, which will be nice.  In this book, Julia’s story is told in small snapshots scattered throughout the book.  I’m interested in learning more.  I enjoyed The French Chef and her several other shows.  On the downside, though, it will be nearly impossible to capture the wonderful narration of the book within the confines of the film– narration is nearly always lost the the translation.

Overall: yes, yes indeed.

 

If you want more, check the links below.

Julie’s orginal blog: http://blogs.salon.com/0001399/2002/08/25.html

Julie’s current blog: http://juliepowell.blogspot.com/2005_08_01_archive.html

and, for more of Julia Child herself, check out the PBS site: http://video.pbs.org/program/1073557581/?gclid=CPyj9ozPgJwCFQZlswodLktC_w

[Via http://lizaanne42.wordpress.com]

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Book Review: Jen's Tale

Cast a spell by Estefanie at 10:24 AM

Jen’s Tale by Christopher Newman

Red Rose Publishing

July 2009

EBook $2.99

ISBN #978-1-60435-358-7

Science Fiction, Futuristic

Buy Now

Author Site

Publisher Site

Book Description:

Is love enough to save us?
Jennifer Allen is not who she seems to be. Her friends, family, and neighbors all think they know the twenty-six year old automobile engineer, but they couldn’t be more wrong.
Jen isn’t even human. Sent by her government to explore the Earth and it’s global warming crisis she is to report back if conditions are right for her aquatic species to colonize the world.
She is dedicated to her mission, until she meets Brent Ashcroft, a handsome and sexy biology graduate student. Jen can’t deny her attraction to him. Will she endanger herself by loving Brent or will she help usher in an alien invasion?

Book Review:
To whom it may concern. I come to you with tale unlike any other. It’s a tale depicting the one Jennifer Alan. It will show to others the adventures will go through to. Not to mention to show Jen the true mean of love and sex.
To whom it may concern. I bring you another exciting person named Brent. Whose sole purpose in life it seems to make Jen a very happy woman. You will come to learn like Jen, there is more than meets the eye.
Jen‟alein, a native of the Aquellian Empire, was sent to scout Earth to see if it’s good enough Aquellian’s to live on.
But what Jen didn’t count on in the insignificant planet a human worthy of saving. Nor did she count on developing those damn human feeling called love.
Brent seems like an ordinary man who seems to want to put a smile on Jen’s sour face. He slowly manages to crack the wall Jen has around her heart. It sure gives him points for being the reason for Jen to be a very satisfied woman.
Just when Jen and Brent are at crucial moment in their lives, she has to leave the city. Jen promises to keep in touch with Brent but this would not be a great book with a little bit of angst involved.

Christopher Newman is great writer of many books like the one titled, A Terrible Twist of Fate. Mr. Newman now brings readers a new take of alien invasion. His new twist on aliens taking over humans can only be described as fresh and original.
Jen is her faults but we can’t help but love her attitude. The ups and downs she goes through by being with Brent.
Brent isn’t going to just let the best thing that ever happened disappear from his life. He is going to be in the fight of his life. He does whatever it takes to bring back home the love of his life.
I can’t but love Jen’s Tale. It was definitely something in a class of its own. If you’re crazy about science fiction then Jen’s Tale is the one for you.

To it may concern, this one story you won’t be able to stop reading to the climatic end.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Review: Snow Melts in Spring

I knew I’d like “Snow Melts in Spring.” How could I not, it is written by one of my first “writing buddies,” Deborah Vogts.

I met Debbie at Called To Write, the first writing conference I ever went to in Girard, Kan. At the time, she was working on marketing Seasons of the Tallgrass, a contemporary fiction series based in the beautiful Flint Hills of Kansas. Last year, Debbie and I had a blast driving together to the American Christian Fiction Writers Conference in Minneapolis. By then, she’d sold the first three books of the series to Zondervan and even had the mock up of the front cover.

What I didn’t realize is that Debbie is one knock-out writer. From beginning to end, “Snow Melts in Spring” is rich and engaging.

 Mattie Evans is a country veterinarian working long, hard hours to build a practice in the Flint Hills, where her heart calls home. She takes on a demanding patient in a horse critically injured in a car accident. Caring for the horse is one thing, but contending with his owner is another. Gil McCray left the Flint Hills – and the memories buried there – long ago to pursue a pro football career. You can imagine what transpires… but not quite. This book has some intriguing plot twists.

Debbie, a country girl herself, does a masterful job of creating an exciting story while capturing the gentle rhythm of life on the Kansas prairie. Her attention to details on horse-related matters is refreshing after reading too many stories from writers who wouldn’t know horse matters if they stepped in it.

The most rewarding thing about reading this book is relating to the complex, but realistic characters and being inspired by God’s hand in their lives. Debbie has created a compelling story and I’m looking forward to reading the next Season of the Tallgrass.

“Snow Melts in Spring” is recommended for: all animal lovers, especially horse lovers. Football fans. Country girls. Readers who want more substance and less fluff. Rodeo fans. Those dealing with guilt or regret. Anyone who thinks cowboys are romantic.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

I still haven't read The Reason for God by Tim Keller

Earlier this year I read his The Prodigal God with great delight.  But I still haven’t come around to his The Reason for God.

“In this apologia for Christian faith, Keller mines material from literary classics, philosophy, anthropology and a multitude of other disciplines to make an intellectually compelling case for God.” Publishers Weekly

For some odd reason I find myself aching to read a book on the existence of God.

Monday, July 27, 2009

I dared to call Him, Father

Before you read further: I just read this book by Bilquis sheikh (I Dared to call Him Father). I could not write a book review as this is the life of a Woman of God, so the next best thing is to present her testimony in a short manner. I highly recommend this book to any believer.

I Dared To Call Him Father
By Bilquis Sheikh from Pakistan

Born in 1920 into a family of noble birth, Bilquis Sheikh, as a middle-aged married woman was deserted by her husband, a general and a minister in the Pakistani government. She retreated to her family mansion to live out her life in tranquil luxury with her grandson and fourteen servants. It was here that some extraordinary things began to happen.

“La illaha illa Allah, Muhammad rasul Allah (there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is the prophet of Allah).”

The call drifted through her bedroom window. Every morning for 46 years it had echoed in her ears. The normalcy of the call to prayer was a comfort after the strangeness of the previous night, when Bilquis had experienced an evil presence in her garden. Being a practical woman, she had tried to rationalise away the experience, but when her grandson also experienced a similar presence, she took the advice of her maids and summoned the local Mullah. For three days he recited prayers and portions of the Qur’an in Arabic. Everything seemed to return to normal. In her biography Bilquis relates the story:

“After these experiences I found myself drawn to the Qur’an. Perhaps it would help to explain the events and at the same time fill the emptiness within me. Certainly its curved Arabic script had often sustained my family in the past. Previously, I had read the Qur’an as a duty. This time I felt I should really search its pages. I took my copy, which had belonged to my mother, relaxed on the white eiderdown coverlet of my bed and began to read. I started with the very first revelation to the young prophet Muhammad, as he sat by himself in a cave on Mount Hira:

‘Read in the name of thy Lord who created, He created man from a clot. Read and thy Lord is most honourable, who taught [to write] with the pen, taught man what he knew not’ (Surah 96:1-5).

“At first I was lost in the beauty of the words. But later on in the book there were words that did not comfort me at all:

‘And when you divorce women and they reach their prescribed time, then either retain them in good fellowship or set them free with liberality’ (Surah 2:231).

“My husband’s eyes looked like black steel when he told me that he did not love me anymore. I shrivelled inside as he spoke. What had happened to all our years together! Could they be dismissed just like that? Had I, as the Qur’an said, ‘reached my term’? The next morning I picked up the Qur’an again, hoping to find the assurance I needed so desperately. But the assurance never came. I found only directives on how to live and warnings against other beliefs. There were verses about the prophet Jesus whose message, the Qur’an said, had been falsified by early Christians. Though born of a virgin, Jesus was not God’s son. ‘Say not three’, warns the Qur’an against the Christian concept of the Trinity. ‘Desist, it is better for you. God is only One God: far be it from His glory that He should have a son’ (Surah 2:171).

“Back in my bedroom that evening as I read, the Qur’an’s many references to the Jewish and Christian writings, which preceded it, again impressed me. Perhaps, I wondered, I should continue my search among those earlier books? But that would mean reading the Bible. How could the Bible help since, as everyone knew, the early Christians had falsified so much of it? But the idea of reading the Bible became more and more persistent. But where would I obtain a Bible? Perhaps Raisham (my maidservant) would have a copy. But I dismissed the thought. Even if she did, my request would frighten her. Pakistanis have been murdered for even appearing to persuade Muslims to turn traitor-Christian.

“I could understand why Raisham, a Christian, refused to talk about the murder of a Muslim who had recently become a Christian. She knew, as well as I did, who had killed that girl. The girl had forsaken her Muslim faith to be baptised a Christian. So her brother, infuriated by the shame this sin had brought upon his family, had obeyed the ancient law of the faithful, that those who fall away from their faith must be slain.”

In the end Bilquis asked her Christian chauffeur to procure a Bible for her. He was so afraid that Bilquis had to threaten to fire him before a Bible mysteriously appeared on a table. When her daughter, Tooni, called in to see her, she noticed the Bible on the table and asked Bilquis to read something from it.

“Light-heartedly, I opened the little Bible and looked down at the pages. Then, a mysterious thing happened. It was as if my attention was being drawn to a verse in the lower right hand corner of the right page. I bent close to read it:

‘I will call them My people, who were not My people; and her beloved, who was not beloved. And it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them, You are not my people; there they shall be called the sons of the living God’ (Romans 9:25-26).

“I caught my breath and a tremor passed through me. Why was this verse affecting me so? I closed the book, murmured something about this not being a game anymore and turned the conversation to another subject. But the words burned in my heart. Early in the evening of the next day, I retired to my bedchamber where I planned to rest and meditate. I took the Bible with me and once again leafed through its pages. I read another puzzling passage:

‘But Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, has not attained to the law of righteousness’ (Romans 9:31).

“Ah, I thought, just as the Qur’an said; the Jews had missed the mark. The writer of these passages might have been a Muslim, for he continued to speak of the people of Israel as not knowing God’s righteousness. But the next passage made me catch my breath again. ‘For Christ is the end of the struggle for righteousness by the law to everyone who believes’ (Romans 10:4). I lowered the book down for a moment. Christ? Was He the end of the struggle? I continued to read: ‘For the word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart…that if you confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is the Lord, and believe in your heart that God has raised him from the dead, you will be saved’ (Romans 10:8-9).

“I put the book down again, shaking my head. This directly contradicted the Qur’an. Muslims knew the prophet Jesus was only human, that he did not die on the cross but was whisked up to heaven by God and a look-alike put on the cross instead. Now dwelling in an inferior heaven, this Jesus will someday return to earth to reign for forty years, marry, have children, and then die. In fact, I heard that there is a special grave plot kept vacant for his remains in Medina, the city where Muhammad is also buried. On the day of resurrection, Jesus will rise and stand with other men to be judged before Almighty God. But this Bible said Christ was raised from the dead. It was either blasphemy or…my mind whirled. I knew that whoever called upon the name of Allah would be saved. But to believe that Jesus Christ is God? Even Muhammad, the final and greatest of the messengers of God, the Seal of the Prophets, was only mortal.

“I lay back on my bed, my hand over my eyes. If the Bible and Qur’an represent the same God, why is there so much confusion and contradiction? I do not know when I fell asleep.”

After further study and some vivid dreams, Bilquis, armed with many questions, decided to visit some educated Christians. That evening she drove her black Mercedes to the home of the Mitchells. His shocked wife opened the door, only to see Bilquis standing there. She came to the point quickly. She asked Mrs. Mitchell whether she knew anything about God. Mrs. Mitchell’s answer startled Bilquis: “I’m afraid I don’t know too much about God,” she said, “but I do know Him.”

“Mrs. Mitchell,” Bilquis gasped, “forget I am a Muslim. Just tell me: what do you mean when you say you know God?”

“I know Jesus,” replied the preacher’s wife. Bilquis relates what happened next. “Then she told me what God had done for her and for the world, by breaking the dreadful deadlock between sinful man and Himself by personally visiting this earth in human flesh (the Lord Jesus Christ) and dying for sinners on the cross. The room was quiet again. I could hear trucks passing on the nearby main road. Mrs. Mitchell seemed in no hurry to speak. Finally, hardly believing my own ears, I took a deep breath: ‘Mrs. Mitchell, some peculiar things have been happening at our house lately. Events of the spirit. Good and bad; both. I feel as if I am in the midst of an immense tug of war and I need all the help I can get. Could you pray for me?’

“The woman appeared startled at my request, then, collecting herself, she asked if I wanted to stand up, kneel or sit down as we prayed. I shrugged, suddenly horrified. All were equally unthinkable. But there was this slender, youthful woman kneeling on the floor of her bungalow. And I followed her! ‘Oh Spirit of God,’ said Mrs. Mitchell in a soft voice, ‘I know nothing that will convince Begum Sheikh who Jesus is. But I thank You that You take the veil off our eyes and reveal Jesus to our hearts. Oh, Holy Spirit, do this for Begum Sheikh. Amen’.”

Bilquis returned home and read John’s Gospel, as Mrs. Mitchell had recommended her to do. She immediately read a startling announcement about Jesus, “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Some days later, Bilquis had to take her grandson into hospital. In the waiting room she read her Bible, which caught the eye of a Christian doctor. After a discussion, the doctor, with tears in her eyes, encouraged Bilquis to pray to God in a personal way.

“Why don’t you pray to the God you are searching for?” she said. “Ask Him to show you His way. Talk to Him as if He were your friend. Talk to Him as if He were your Father.”
“On returning home I prayed, ‘I am confused, Father. I have to get one thing straight right away.’ I reached over to the bedside table where I kept the Bible and the Qur’an side by side. I picked up both books and lifted them, one in each hand. ‘Which, Father?’ I asked. ‘Which one is your book?’ The thought came to me – in which book is God revealed as a Father? Why, the Bible of course!”

There and then a battle began to rage as Bilquis determined to read the New Testament right the way through. She now fully realised she would have to accept Jesus as the Son of God to know the forgiveness of her sins and eternal life in Heaven. She thought of all the rejection she would receive from her family. ‘Traitor’ – that’s what they would call her. Fear came over her as she recalled the Islamic command that ‘Whoever of you turns back from his religion, then he dies while an unbeliever, these…are the inmates of the fire [hell]‘ (Surah 2:217). But the Lord Jesus Christ, in the Bible, demanded total allegiance and would not settle for anything less than complete submission and commitment. As she came to Revelation, the last book of the Bible, she read:

“See, I stand knocking at the door. If anyone listens to my voice and opens the door, I will go into his house and dine with him, and he with Me” (Revelation 3:20).

Bilquis saw the issue clearly. The scriptures, the dreams, the intervention of Christians – everything was conspiring to point her in one direction. Decision time loomed. Accept or reject? Open the door or close it. She knelt in front of the fire. From her broken, repentant and divinely convinced heart, she cried out in faith, ‘Oh God, don’t wait a moment. Please come into my life. Every bit of me is open to You.’ She believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. She was saved and she knew it. It was 3 O’clock in the morning on December 24th, 1966.

What a change came over Bilquis! She was a new person in Christ. As time passed, she invited all the poor people from the village into her mansion. Instead of looking down on the poor, she embraced them. Instead of being a bitter recluse who constantly scolded her servants, she became gracious and joyful. With Christ’s help she could forgive her husband for dumping her. She discovered that when she lived in obedience to Christ, a wonderful peace and presence of God was with her; but when she disobeyed, by acting in pride or self-sufficiency, she felt God’s presence withdrawing. In this way, and as she studied the Bible, she discovered how to live a consistent Christian life.

Word leaked out that she had become a Christian and that she attended a Christian group. Her family rejected her as a traitor. The local people abused her. Threatening letters and telephone calls started coming her way. Most of her servants fled as rumours increased that some religious Muslims from the Mosque were plotting her death after Friday prayers. The threat of being burnt out was very real. One day she smelt smoke. Thankfully, Bilquis and her servants managed to extinguish the flames before the whole house caught fire. Finally in 1972, after experiencing 6 years of persecution, Bilquis and her grandson left for America where she lived until 1997. At the age of 77 she passed into the wonderful presence of her beloved Saviour to be with Him forever.


Book by Bilquis Sheikh

Source: http://thepilgrimage.org.uk/testimony4/

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Introducing: Argosy Junction ** Win a Copy**

I’m doing a shameless plug for my own book because I really want to share some things about this story that are very dear to me.

First, I want to talk about my inspiration for this story.  Argosy Junction began as a NaNoWriMo challenge.  I’ve done NaNo for three straight years.  The first year, I challenged myself to write a romance (that being the point of the story rather than a part of the story), and Hope 101 was the result.  Last year, I made myself stick to an outline (I never write with an outline… I usually don’t know the end of the story when I start writing!), and I finished a week ahead of time with Thirty Days Hath… In 2007, my NaNo challenge to myself was to write about a subject near and dear to my heart.  Phariseeism and what happens when it grows into legalism.  Argosy Junction, then called Not As I Was, took months to finish even though I wrote the allotted fifty thousand words in the thirty day time frame of NaNoWriMo.

In Argosy Junction, a small group of like-minded families grow more unified of mind until deviations from the core are seen as sin and rebellion rather than individual methods of applying principles.  I’d seen this happening repeatedly with friends and online and it hit home closely.  I love rules.  I confess, I see how ’spiritual’ I look with rules.  I tend to lean toward Phariseeism in my heart so writing this book was very cleansing to see where I might end up if not careful.

Nothing that the church in this book encouraged was wrong in and of itself.  Much of it is a part of my own life.  From clothing choices to gender roles, I support them all,  and this book was not intended to be a vilification of anyone’s personal convictions.  My point in writing this book wasn’t to attack anyone’s application of scripture.  Rather, my purpose was to show what happens when we make our applications law where scripture does not.  I took each tiny extreme to its “logical” conclusion and showed the pain that resulted and how that pain affects different people.  (You see the varying ways that different people respond.  From growing hard, to panic at change, clinging closer to the rules, to utter rejection of the Lord and His church,  people handle the extremes very differently.)

The other thing I wanted to share with you was the unintentional symbolism in the story.  I’d originally started with a bison ready to charge as an opening to the book.  My dear friend Judy had an obstetrician who met her husband in Montana while she was reading a book and looked up to see a bison pawing the ground.  Her thought, “how picturesque.”  A Jeep raced across the countryside, a door flew open, and my friend’s doctor was ordered into the Jeep by a park ranger who eventually became her husband.  She later discovered that Mr. Bison was ready to “charge”.  I had considered using that as my opening scene.  I thought it’d be fun to put her story into print, but I was changing it up quite a bit.  Then I learned that there is some kind of book that begins with a very similar story happening in the Outback or some place like that.  Well, I didn’t want that.  So, I went for comic relief and brought in sheep.

My reason for explaining all of this is to show how unintentional the use of sheep in the book was.  For the sheep rancher’s family to be the ones who have walked away from the Lord’s “flock” was a bit of irony that I couldn’t have planned if I’d tried.  On top of that, seeing the shepherd being one of the main people who led the Lord’s flock down that path away from His “green pastures” really brought home the point that we always look to The Shepherd, not just a shepherd and how important it is for the Lord’s shepherds to keep His flock in His fields and not lead them astray.

This brings us to the final thing I wanted to share.  The cover of this book has so much unintentional symbolism it almost hurts.  At first, I was looking at page after page of sheep pictures, pictures of the Montana Rockies, and horses.  I tried ranches, boots, and even guitars and hats.  Finally, I realized that maybe a piece of barbed wire would give enough empty space for words, so I looked for that.  The moment I saw this barbed wire with a bit of wool attached to it, I knew I’d found my cover.

As I recently contemplated the picture, my heart constricted.  The Lord puts protective fences around our hearts and lives.  He does this out of love and concern for our physical, spiritual, and emotional safety.  That’s what the piece of fence on the book would symbolize, but it has a barb.  That barb is just like the additional rules and regulations man adds to the Lord’s fences.  Perfectly harmless if you keep an eye out for the fence and keep away, but if you aren’t careful and get too close, it can hurt.  If you look very closely, you’ll see that the wool on that barb is tinged with blood.  Oh, how it hurts me to realize how often the church is the cause of Christians’ deepest wounds.

The cover shows all of this, and I can’t take credit for it.  It wasn’t intentional.  I don’t like to credit or discredit the Lord’s hand in anything.  To say the Lord did this, implies that somehow my cover is ‘inspired’ and that is not what I mean to say.  However, I can’t help but wonder if the Lord didn’t lead me to the very picture that I needed for my book knowing that there was this subtle story within the picture that symbolizes a major theme in this book.

I am so excited about this book.  While Noble Pursuits is always going to be dear to my heart as one of the first stories I wrote as an adult, Argosy Junction is a deeper more well-rounded story.  I always recommend Noble Pursuits with a caveat, but I have no caveat for Argosy Junction.

Argosy Junction will be available through Amazon.com in six to eight weeks.  Until then, it is best purchased directly from me.  Just email me at:  chautona at chautona dot com.

However, in keeping with my tradition of giving away copies of books I review, I thought it only fair to give away a copy of Argosy Junction so please do leave a comment if you’d like to win a free copy!

Stay tuned for an upcoming blog contest for those who have read the book!  Both bloggers and their commenters will have a chance to win!

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Mr Robinson reports

I’ve been reading the Port Phillip journals of George Augustus Robinson.  Note that these are the Port Phillip ones, not those that he wrote in Van Diemen’s Land which were edited by N.J.B.  Plomley.  Actually,  Plomley’s work has had a bit of renaissance lately, with the republishing of his Friendly Mission and the release of Reading Robinson,  a set of essays by various authors which extends Robinson’s work into a broader imperial context.   I have this book of essays on hold, and shall report anon.

Robinson himself seems to be undergoing a reconsideration.  Until recently, his main biography has been Black Robinson by Vivienne Rae-Ellis, a vehement biography that depicts him as an incompetent and dishonourable liar and cheat.   Rae-Ellis’ book had a troubled publication history and  received much critical comment on its publication (Pybus, 2003).   Keith Windschuttle in his Fabrication of Aboriginal History interprets this as an attack on Rae-Ellis for her negative depiction of Robinson, who has been treated more benignly by Henry Reynolds, Lyndall Ryan and other historians that he himself attacked for their depiction of Aboriginal history.  Perhaps it’s a matter of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” because Windschuttle certainly did not extend the same level of scrutiny to Rae-Ellis as he did to Reynolds and Ryan.

Robinson’s Tasmanian journals have received most of the attention, but the ones I’ve been reading are his Port Phillip journals, written after he had spent several years on the blighted Flinders Island with his dwindling band of natives.   He took with him to Port Phillip  several Aborigines from Flinders Island, including Truganini, Wooredy, and Matilda/Mathinna  (from Richard Flanagan’s Wanting).   He arrived in Melbourne in February 1839, prior to La Trobe.  His instructions were vague.  Glenelg at the Colonial Office in London sent a copy of the report of the 1837  parliamentary  Select Committee  to Gipps, with recommendations to protect, educate, provide religious education for and ‘civilize’ the aborigines.   Glenelg told Gipps to fill in the details, but Gipps was loathe to do so.  He argued that Robinson had been appointed Chief Protector on the strength of his “acquired experience superior to that which is possess by any other individual in the Colony”, and he was left largely to define the role himself.  It seems that La Trobe was keen for Robinson to move around the District: he sent him on his trips to the Western District and was reluctant to appoint Robinson as a town magistrate lest it “seem to form the idea that his Duties lie in Melbourne instead of in the Bush” (Gipps to La Trobe 11 Feb 1843).  But his role did, indeed, involve both administration in Melbourne- in fact, he was appointed an office in Willis’  “old” Supreme Court building once the “new” courthouse was opened- and field work both supervising the Assistant Protectors and recording the language, names and habits of Aborigines throughout the District both as a form of ethnographic study and census.

This dual focus of  acting both as administrator and protector is reflected in his journals.  Inga Clendinnen tells us in her memoir Tiger’s Eye that she  drew on Robinson’s diary of his Western District  journey between 20 March and 15 August 1841 as her first step back into the academic waters after a long period of illness.  Her essay ‘Reading Mr Robinson’ focusses on Robinson’s  journey, but the George Augustus Robinson we see in the saddle, riding from tribe to tribe and outstation to outstation is not the same fussy, petty man that we see around the streets of Melbourne.  His role was not just to observe and count: he was also a minor bureaucrat puffed up with self-importance but ultimately impotent and compromised when the pointy end of the law intersected with the humanitarian aspects of his task.

Clendinnen admits “I have become very fond of Mr Robinson”.  I’m not quite as fulsome.  The ‘town’ Mr Robinson is rather wearing; in management-speak he is unable  ‘upwardly manage’ his relationship with his superiors (if indeed, he even perceives them as such), and he undermines and backstabs the assistant protectors under his supervision- although admittedly some of them were a rum lot too.  His attitude towards the Aborigines he brought over with him from Flinders Island is puzzling: he distances himself emotionally from the execution of  “Bob” and “Jack” for murder in January 1842, fulminating about process but oblivious to the tragedy; he goes into organiser-mode for the return of the women to Flinders Island without expressing any regret. The death of Peter Brune, who did not return to Flinders Island but remained with him as his native right-hand man, is brusque and matter-of-fact.

He doesn’t really seem to “get” Aboriginal communication, despite his compiling of long lists of words.  The whole idea of bringing the Van Diemen’s land natives over to smooth his path with the mainlain Aborigines highlights his lack of awareness of the distinctiveness of the Tasmanian tribes.   His interaction is often completely utilitarian on his own terms: he is dismissive of the context of communication wanting only the content:

When the natives appear I brake through all Aboriginal ceremony [sic] (which to observe would be a waste of time) and go forth and meet them  (10 May 1841)

There are several occasions of riding into a location incognito, and pumping people for information about “Robinson”- a curious way of gaining feedback, if that’s what he was doing.

Although, having said all this, there are times when the humanitarian breaks through, and I think that this side of him is what Clendinnen is responding to.  He is genuinely filled with admiration when he sees the construction of eel-traps, and acknowledges the ingenuity, strength and dedication of the men who created them, quite irrespective of race.  He is sceptical of the numbers of deaths reported by the settlers; he decries the preference for emancipated convicts as workers who, unlike new emigrants were not frightened of the natives.  He hears, and understands, the aboriginal claims on the land:

I should remark that, when Tung.bor.roong spoke of Borembeep and other localities of his own nativity he always added ‘that’s my country belonging to me!! That’s my country belonging to me!!” This language language is [plain] but not the less forcible on that account.  Some people have observed, in reference to the natives occupying their country, what could they do with it?  The answer is plain- they could live upon it and enjoy the pleasures of the chase as do the rich of our own nation (17 July 1841)

He is dismissive of the stories of cannibalism relayed to him by the settlers- “Fudge!”. And when he comes across a settler who freely admits murdering five natives,  he is chilled and repulsed by the man.  He is determined not to partake of the lonely man’s desperate hospitality:

Francis pressed me to sleep in his hut and it was evident the bed had been prepared, clean sheets and pillow case.  He entreated and said he would play me a tune on the fiddle and I was to make myself at home, &c.  I however had made up my mind to sleep in the van and got away.  I could not sleep in the place; I was disgusted and my heart sickened when I thought of the awful sacrifice of life done by this individual.  He acknowledged to five, the natives say seven.  (30 July 1841)

On leaving the man as quickly as he can, he passes a skull planted nearby- shades of Kurtz.  Robinson knows the message it is sending- and no doubt the local tribes do too

I cannot conceive why this skull was permitted to remain exposed in such a situation; it is doubtless best known to Francis. (30 July 1841)

With my almost endless ability to be diverted from actually writing my thesis (as distinct from wool-gathering about it), I’m looking forward to reading the new Robinson essays.  I’ve also borrowed a book of Sievwright, the assistant protector who was the cause of much scandal and criticism from all sides.  More on him anon too.

References:

Ian D. Clark  The Journals of George Augustus Robinson, Chief Protector, Port Phillip Aboriginal Protectorate, Volume Two: 1 October 1840-31 August 1841 Melbourne, Heritage Matters, 1998.

Ian D. Clark (Ed) The Journals of George Augustus Robinson, Chief Protector, Port Phillip Aboriginal Protectorate, Volume Three: 1 September 1841- 31 December 1843Melbourne, Heritage Matters, 1998

Inga Clendinnen Tigers Eye 2001 (includes the essay ‘Reading Mr Robinson’)

Anna Johnston and Mitchell Rolls (eds). Reading Robinson 2008

N.J.B. Plomley Friendly Mission 1966

Cassandra Pybus ‘Robinson and Robertson’   in R. Manne (ed) Whitewash: On Keith Windschuttle’s Fabrication of Aboriginal History, Black Inc, 2203

Vivienne Rae-Ellis Black Robinson: Protector of Aborigines 1988

A.G. L. Shaw  A History of the Port Phillip District: Victoria before Separation 1996

A.G.L. Shaw Gipps-La Trobe Correspondence

Keith Windshuttle  The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, 2002


Friday, July 24, 2009

The Book of Air and Shadows, John Gruber

I finally finished this book, but it took me a while.  I found it to be shallow, with weak and flawed characters. The plot was thin…focused on two men.  One an egotistical intellectual property attorney with many “issues” (he was the main character) and the other a well-meaning, somewhat timid bookstore bookkeeper. Their connection is a Shakespeare manuscript and a woman, a mysterious woman.  Now I must explain that I was intrigued by this book because I thought that it would be of the same ilk as “Shadow of the Wind” and “The Rule of Four”, both literary intrigue novels. I was sorely mistaken to put this one into the same category.  I found, when finished, that the plot was really secondary. The book was more a self-centered search into the egotistical and troubled psyche of Jake Mishkin.  I will say, on a positive note, that at times, Jake Mishkin made me laugh in his writing style.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Christian Imperialism: "A Myth of Innocence" Part V

Mack thinks the Markan legacy came at too high of a price.  Instead of the social experimentation and constructive visions of Jesus groups and Christ cults, he believes Mark gave way to a sectarian mentality (331).  Followers of Jesus are innocent in a hostile world and outsiders (the Other) must either join the group or face apocalyptic judgment.  For Mack, this too easily translates into a myth of America’s innocence and manifest destiny to civilize the world as the sole superpower (369-374).  In the end, Mack calls on us to give up our “messiahs” in a multicultural world and that ”the church canonized a remarkably pitiful moment of early Christian condemnation of the world” (376).

To some extent, the equation of Christianity with civil religion (e.g. The American Patriot’s Bible), the “War on Terror” and the stereotype of the Muslim as the Other, and fundamentalist Christians who see events in the Middle East through the lens of an apocalyptic timetable, has justified Mack’s critique.  Mack is also right to condemn imperialistic attitudes and anti-Semitism in the history of western christendom.  But could it be that Mark would also be horrified by this legacy?  Mark can be read as anti-imperial (as Richard Horsley argues), opposing the temple elites and their Roman imperial overlords in the name of God’s Kingdom.  Jesus is a different kind of king who cares for the marginalized (sinners, the impure) and gives up his power in self-sacrificial love (Mark 10:45).  His kingdom is not like the state and does not advance by worldly power; instead the disciples are to follow Jesus’ example of servanthood (9:33-37; 10:42-45).  But the final coming of the kingdom and Son of Man in power gave hope to Christ followers during their trials and expresses the hope that their present suffering is temporary, that the story does not end in the cross but in resurrection.  Would God be good if He remains indifferent to all the oppression and injustice in the world?

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Book Review: Wedding Season by Katie Fforde

Sarah Stratford is a wedding planner with a difference – she doesn’t actually believe in love. She is great at her job and loves organising wonderful weddings for people but that’s as far as it goes – she’s got no love life herself. She’s got 2 friends she counts on for help at her weddings – hairdresser and make up lady Bron whose stuck in a loveless relationship, and dressmaker Elsa who likes it behind the scenes.

When Sarah manages to sign herself up for 2 very important weddings on the same day, she needs her friends more than ever and they all have to pull together to pull off the amazing weddings their clients want. They’re so busy, they haven’t got time to even think about their own love lives, but is love coming out from the most unlikely places?

I’ve read a few of Katie Fforde’s novels before and very much enjoyed them, my favourite so far being “The Rose Revived” which I read a few years ago now. My lovely fiance and 3 year old son bought me this book, Wedding Season, for my birthday last month and I was thrilled as I had been eyeing it up in the shops for a few weeks before then anyway! My to-read pile is getting ever higher, but my little boy was insistent I read this book as soon as possible so I gave into him and started it last week, and I finished within days, it was such an enjoyable read!

As per the title, the book is centred around the wedding industry. This isn’t something I know too much about myself, but Katie Fforde has clearly done her research because all aspects of weddings are spoken about here! The 3 leading ladies all have vital roles in the creation of someone’s wedding; Sarah the wedding planner, Bron the hairdresser and Elsa the dress designer. They’re all unlucky in love themselves and I really liked them for this – they were determined to make the bride’s day special even though things weren’t great for themselves. They are all likeable ladies, and very real characters as well, you can imagine yourself getting on with them because they are both very real.

The rest of the story is quite a fun read too. Seeing Sarah try to juggle 2 special weddings leads to a few funny moments, and some awkward situations as well. You can fully imagine these things happening at someone’s wedding which makes some of the scenarios even funnier. The weddings are not the be all and end all of the book, it also looks at the relationships (or lack of) of the 3 women, and the development of these keeps you hooked as you read on and I really enjoyed this aspect of the book. The book travels across the country, into the city and back out into the country and an old country house as well and Fforde’s writing really brings these places to life.

Fforde’s writing style is very easy to read, and it is one of those books you can pick up and put down easily throughout the day. The story moved at a very good pace, and didn’t feel rushed at any point. I really cared about the 3 women by the end and really cared about what happened to them and their individual relationships. The book is a great insight into the wedding industry and just how much goes into the planning of someone’s big day, I really had no idea how much was involved! It’s a lovely romantic book which is great to curl up on the sofa with, and will leave you with a big smile on your face by the end. Highly recommended, and thank you to my lovely fiance and son for buying me my book!

Rating: 5/5

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Creating Things: Profile of Roger McTair (Originally Published on Impowerage.com)

Roger McTair Creates Magic - Photo Courtesy of Seneca College's Website

Roger McTair is a director, poet, professor and writer who lives in Toronto, Canada. He has had short stories air on CBC Radio and BBC Radio.

He was born in Trinidad and Tobago on October 7, 1943. Not having much to do while growing up galvanized his love of creating things.

“I grew up in a film-loving country and there were few outlets, one of them were sports for boys, soccer, cricket, the movies, hanging out – the movies,” says McTair. “There were very limited things to do. There was some theatre if you were middle class, but there wasn’t a lot of theatre.

“Yeah, we would go to the movies,” continues McTair. “Very specifically what happened when I was about 17 they would only show European movies and I found them so different. A lot of Italian movies, a lot of French movies, so I sort of realized at that point that you didn’t have to make movies only about cowboys and Indians. I looked at a lot of Japanese movies too.”

McTair came to Canada in 1969. He went back to Trinidad and Tobago for awhile, then returned to Canada in 1970.

“I had a lot of friends here,” McTair says. “I had friends in Brooklyn too.”

He went to what is now known as Ryerson University. He has also taken some courses at the University of Toronto and a lot of workshops. He studied film and a lot of philosophy at Ryerson.

“I did a lot of freelance writing for Caribbean newspapers and the black newspapers in Toronto.” McTair says about what he did after he graduated from Ryerson.

He started making movies in 1979. Mainly his career has focused on documentaries. His first film was called, It’s Not an Illness. It was about being able to run while pregnant to the very end. This film garnered McTair a finalist position at the Genies (Canada’s version of the Oscars). It also won an award with a medical association in California.

“I made Home to Buxton [next]. Home to Buxton won a Genie and it showed in New York and California. I made a film with Jennifer Hodge called Home Feeling. It showed a lot. It was about the relationship between the police and the Jane-Finch community in Toronto.”

McTair has done some work with Vision-TV. His almost complete filmography also includes Hymn to Freedom done in 1994 with Almeta Speak Productions. Children Are Not the Problem done with the Congress of Black Women of Canada in 1991. Jane-Finch Again done with Prieto-McTair Productions in 1997. Different Timbres that was a short at 14 minutes. His latest film was Journey to Justice done in 2000 for the National Film Board.

McTair has been teaching at Seneca College for about 16 years or more. He teaches media writing (basic writing), documentary, film, second semester media writing, advanced media writing, analyzing short stories and doing film and documentary.

McTair has done a lot of short story writing and written a couple plays, plus opinion piece writing. He used to write for the Star quite a bit. McTair has also done some poetry. He has been published with Caribbean newspapers and one of them broadcasted with the BBC, the fable book of Caribbean short stories is published with Faber. It’s called the Faber Book of Caribbean Short Stories.

“I have stories published in an academic text in Boston,” says McTair. “It’s for students doing courses, such as English and writing with a huge press in the States.”

He’s done so many things and no longer keeps a resume, so he has stopped keeping track.

In terms of health, McTair describes his as “mediocre for 65.” He has high blood pressure and could be in a lot better shape. McTair goes to his doctor on a regular basis and also walks.

“I’m quite casual about life, I don’t always know when I’m stressed.”

You can hear the pride and joy in McTair’s voice when he speaks of his son Ian Kamau Prieto-McTair.

“He had an Ontario Arts Council grant to work with Schools Without Borders. Now he is working on some youth project.”

Prieto-McTair is an artist-at-large.

“The apple did not fall too far from the tree,” that’s what McTair agreed his son says.

“I have always done the same thing that I have done. I have always worked in writing and creative fields. And when I leave Seneca I will continue to do that.”

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Serious about delusion #3

Absence of evidence, evidence of absence… what would a chimpanzee think?

Third in a series responding to Keith Ward’s Why there almost certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins1

See also Serious about delusion #1 and #2

The Problem of Consciousness

Keith Ward: Why there almost certainly is a God

This is the next section of the book, and it gets to the heart (or at least one of the hearts) of Ward’s counter-thesis to The God delusion.2 The mere fact that he actually offers a counter-thesis is something other antidelusionists could learn from.

The problem of consciousness is, he says,

so difficult that no one has any idea of how to begin to tackle it, scientifically. [My emphasis.]

We do not know

how conscious states… can arise from complex physical brain-states. … [or] if conscious states can have a causal effect on brain states, or if they are somehow reducible to brain states in some way we cannot yet explain.

All fairly unexceptionable. But then he takes a passing swipe at Daniel Dennett’s Consciousness explained3 – which failed to convince ‘most competent philosophers’  because, in Ward’s opinion,

you could very easily have brain-states and behaviour without any conscious states at all.

Excuse me? He goes on:

Nobody can observe anyone else’s conscious states, and we cannot really be sure that anyone else has any conscious states at all.

The statement immediately above is of the classic philosophical problem of ‘other minds’. Happy with that. The problem is the apparent assumption that this in any way implies there could ‘very easily’ be brain-states without conscious states or vice versa.

There is of course an obvious sense in which there could be brain-states without conscious states, but this is small help to Ward’s argument. The brain could be dead, it could be boiled or dried out. That would qualify as a ‘brain-state’, but one that few would expect to be accompanied by any conscious state.

We need to get things in the right sequence. The materialist thesis is that conscious states depend on (arise from, are generated by) certain brain states (ie a subset of possible brain states), not that there is a conscious state corresponding to every possible brain state. The dependency is the other way round: the materialist thesis is that there are no conscious states without brain states.

Daniel Dennett

Ward is certainly correct that this thesis is as yet unproven:

We have not yet got to the stage where we can just attach someone’s brain to a recording device and examine their thoughts without asking them to write examination papers, just by measuring electrical activity in their brains.

But to have any sort of discussion there must be agreement on a few axioms. We could for example presuppose that because an individual consciousness can have no proof that any consciousness exists outside its own (a position we might call ‘radical solipsism’), then any argument based on the assumption that ‘other minds’ exist is ruled out. If so, it is hard to see how either the materialist thesis or any counter-thesis could get off the ground. Whom would it be expressed to? What confidence could that individual consciousness have that the terms in which the thesis was expressed had any permanent reference or meaning? What, for that individual consciousness, is the significance of its ‘external reality’, a small part of which presents itself as ‘facts’ about (say) neurophysiology?

Ward continues later:

Few scientifically literate people doubt that human consciousness somehow emerges (we do not know how) from a long, complex evolutionary process. But do we know that no consciousness could exist without being tied to such a physical process?

If we assume an axiom of radical solipsism, that last question is beside the point. How would we know any other consciousness could exist at all, regardless of how it existed?

So we must agree  assumptions with a bit more content. We need to agree to assume (with whatever justification or lack of it) that there are other consciousnesses other than a single ‘first-person’ consciousness; that discourse is possible between at least some of those consciousnesses in at least one language shared between them; that there is an external, publically accessible reality about which meaningful statements can be made in that language; and that that same subset of consciousnesses can and do communicate meaningfully to each other both about that external reality and their private experiences.

In a world like that, then yes we have not yet got to the stage where we can examine people’s thoughts by measuring electrical activity in their brains. But we have a mass of evidence about the correlation between publically observable brain activity and reports of first-person conscious experience.

Richard Dawkins

Ward then refers to a crucial bit of Dawkinsspeak. Richard Dawkins defines the ‘God Hypothesis’ as follows:

there exists a superhuman, supernatural intelligence who deliberately designed and created the universe and everything in it, including us.4

Dawkins then says:

This book will advocate an alternative view: any creative intelligence, of sufficient complexity to design anything, comes into existence only as the end product of an extended process of gradual evolution. Creative intelligences, being evolved, necessarily arrive late in the universe, and therefore cannot be responsible for designing it.5

Ward renders this as follows:

Dawkins’ hypothesis says that consciousness ‘comes into existence ONLY as the end product’ of a long physical process. Further, ‘creative intelligences… NECESSARILY arrive late in the universe’. [Ward’s emphases.]

Ward goes on:

How does he know that? What sort of evidence could there be for thinking that it is absolutely impossible for any form of consciousness to exist except the sort of consciousness that humans have? The most we could say is that we have not come across such a consciousness. … [But] we cannot deny that there might be one. There might be a consciousness that came into existence in some other way.

The spin is subtle but important, because whole religions can be built on such minutiae.

Dawkins is not saying there is something about either consciousness or creative intelligence per se that necessarily make them things which could only have arrived late in the universe. The ‘necessarily’ refers to ‘being evolved’, which Ward excludes. Dawkins is saying that, as a matter of fact, creative intelligence arrived as an end product of evolution, and because of its production by evolution, necessarily arrived relatively late – ie after the beginning of the universe – and therefore could not have created it.

So to answer Ward, of course Dawkins does not know that ‘creative intelligences necessarily arrive late in the universe’ because that is not what he is claiming. The creative intelligences did not have to arrive at all, so there was no necessity in their existence. What Dawkins is saying is that according to the only evidence we have, creative intelligence arose by evolution, and there is no evidence of any creative intelligence which arose in any other way.

Dawkins is not claiming to have any evidence that it is ‘absolutely impossible for any form of consciousness to exist except the sort of consciousness that humans have’. (In fact I am sure he would claim there is evidence of non-human consciousness – in the form of gorilla consciousness, chimpanzee consciousness etc. But I assume Ward meant something more like ‘except the sort of consciousness that humans and other conscious organisms have’.) Dawkins is only claiming there is no evidence for any kind of consciousness other than the kind of consciousness that humans and other conscious organisms have.

Of course absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. But nor does anything exist just because it might exist. This is a necessary truth which our sanity and the horror film industry both depend on.

References

1 Keith Ward, Why there almost certainly is a God: Doubting Dawkins, Lion Hudson, London, 2008.

2 Richard Dawkins, The God delusion, Bantam, 2006.

3 Daniel Dennett, Consciousness explained, 1991.

4 Richard Dawkins, 2006: 2 above; p 31.

5 Richard Dawkins, 2006: 2 above; p 31.

© Chris Lawrence 2009.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Book Review: Marriage and Other Games by Veronica Henry

**Look out for an exclusive interview with Veronica Henry coming very soon!**

Charlotte is absolutely mortified when her husband is arrested for a committing a crime that implicates her in his bad behaviour. She decides to flee to her friend’s ramshackle house in the small Exmoor village of Withybrook where no-one knows whats gone on between her and Ed. She’s surprised to find the villager’s lives are all as peaceful and calm as she imagined either, and she soon befriend local bad-boy and celebrity Sebastian. His marriage isn’t going too well, and is drinking himself into oblivion while his wife works in London. Fitch, married to Hayley is also struggling but with his wife’s wild demands and juggling fatherhood too. Finally, GP Penny is free and single, and is determined to make the most of love this time around, but with who? Will Charlotte regret her move to Withybrook, or is it going to turn out to be the best move she ever made?

I first came across Veronica Henry when my mum told me to read “Love on the Rocks” by her, and I absolutely adored that book – it was well written and such an enjoyable read. I have Veronica’s “Honeycote” series on my shelf to read, and I can’t wait to get around to reading them. I was so excited to get a copy of Veronica’s latest book, the stand-alone story “Marriage and Other Games”, which is Veronica’s 7th book. I was expecting an absorbing and brilliant read, and that is certainly what I got from the book! I passed the novel onto my mum as well, and she enjoyed just as much as I did, proving Veronica’s novels appeal across the generations!

The story, although primarily and initially following the life of Charlotte, does branch out into several characters and I really liked this. There was always something new happening and it totallly held my interest, I didn’t want to put it down at all. The book begins with the breakdown of Charlotte and Ed’s marriage and quickly moves to Withybrook, where the rest of the novel takes place. Withybrook sounds so charming, and quint-essentially English, it sounds so perfect I just want to move there now! The quiet village life, everyone knowing each other’s business and the millionaire artist – who wouldn’t want to live there?!

The character development is beautifully done during the novel – we see Charlotte turn from a very angry and isolated individual to one who fully embraces village life and Withybrook’s inhabitants too.I really liked Charlotte from the beginning, she’s the wronged wife and you can sympathise with her turmoil as she’s forced to leave behind everything that makes her Charlotte. Henry writes with realism about the struggle to settle into an established community, and writes village life so well, you can immerse yourself in it and imagine you’re in Withybrook with them.

As well as Charlotte, all the other characters are brilliant and fit into the story perfectly. I loved the eccentric Sebastian, a misunderstood artist and you can’t help but warm to him because he seems so lonely. Fitch was another character I really liked, I felt so sorry for him and wanted everything to turn out nicely for him. There’s a huge shock towards the end of the book for Fitch and I totally didn’t see it coming at all! For some reason, I couldn’t warm to Penny at all even though her story was again a bit sad. Overall though, they are so well written and believable as people, I could really care about them as the story progressed and that for me is key to enjoying a book!

I loved this book. It started out totally differently from where it ended up but I liked that – it felt like I went on a journey with the characters and I was disappointed that it came to an end. It’s the sort of book you can absorb yourself in, and even though its fairly lengthy, I finished it quickly because I couldn’t stop reading as I wanted to know it was all going to end for the Withybrook residents! Charlotte is the perfect heroine of the book, women will like her and care about her story, and the other characters flit in and out creating a superb novel. It’s fully deserving of its 5 stars from me, and fans, both new and old, of Veronica Henry will love it. Summer reading at its best, just brilliant!

Rating: 5/5

Thank you to the publishers for sending us a copy to review!

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Book Review: I Heart New York by Lindsey Kelk

At her best friend’s wedding, Angela walks in on her long-term boyfriend Mark cheating on her with someone on the back seat of their car. Nice. So she does what any self-respecting woman would do – flees… not just the wedding, but the country as well! Angela ends up in New York City with no friends, no money and no job.

But she soon makes friend with hotel receptionist Jenny and she’s determined to put a smile back on Angela’s face. Cue a LOT of spending in Bloomingdale’s, getting drunk and meeting a couple of hunks along the way too. Angela also lands her dream job of being a writer – it seems everything is going right for her at last. But despite blogging her romance ups and downs, can Angela figure out which man is right for her? Does she heart NYC more than home?

I heard about this book quite a while before I got to actually read a copy, so by the time my library had it in for me, I was quite excited to finally read it and see if it lived up to the hype. It’s bright and colourful cover screams out “chick lit” from the shelf, and plot sounds perfect for me too – exactly the sort of thing I really enjoy reading. I’ve been lucky to enough to visit New York (April 05 and December 05), and I still want to go back! I hoped this book would bring back some memories for me, and it definitely did that!

The book opens with a hilarious scene, and I hoped this was a sign of the rest of the book to come as well. It had me really laughing out loud, and I immediately loved the character of Angela, she seemed so normal and likeable, you couldn’t help but feel sorry for her being cheated on by love-rat Mark! Luckily for us, this is pretty much all we see of the awful Mark, so thank goodness for that. He’s one of those awful male characters you can hate with a passion but then, that’s the point of him isn’t it?! The other characters were well written as well, I really liked Jenny who despite her calm exterior is really a bit bonkers, Tyler the super-suave businessman was a bit too smooth for me and rock-God Alex who wasn’t my cup of tea but still felt like real people and the relationships between them all were so well done by Kelk.

As Angela runs off to New York, this is where the book starts to become slightly unbelievable, and although that isn’t some people’s thing, I actually don’t mind it in a book because I sort of expect everything to be better than it would be in real life! Yes, meeting Jenny and becoming best friends really quickly is unlikely, and yes, meeting 2 gorgeous men and dating both straight away is also unlikely, but it makes for great reading! Angela isn’t sure of anything and the reader can feel her apprehension about the situation yet I still loved it. It made Angela feel normal, and the unlikeliness of the situation yet normality of the lead character made it that bit funnier for me.

For anyone who has been to New York City, this book will definitely reignite some memories for you. Kelk writes in great detail about the glorious lights of Times Square, the breath-taking views atop the Empire State Building and the bitter cold as well! I could totally see in my mind where Kelk was writing about for the most part, and I loved reading about the bits I didn’t get to see when I was there as well. In terms of location research, Kelk has clearly done hers meaning its a great read for both visitors and non-visitors of NYC, although it will make you want to go back there!

If you like your chick-lit fun, readable and funny, then definitely pick up a copy of I Heart New York! With a great cast of characters, a great location and a brilliant (if idealistic!) storyline, its the perfect summer read, and one I will definitely re-read if I ever make it back to the Big Apple! Also, for those of us who love Angela, fear not – its not the last we’ve seen of her! Kelk has another 2 novels following Angela due out soon, I Heart Hollywood (late 2009) and I Heart Paris (2010) so I can’t wait for those! A full 5 stars from me, a really great book.

Visit the themed website with a blog from Angela: http://www.iheartnewyork.co.uk/

Rating: 5/5

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Book Review - Eclipsed by Shadow

Eclipsed by Shadow: The Legend of the Great Horse

BY: John Royce

COVER ARTWORK: Marti Adrian

PUBLISHED BY: Micron Press

PUBLISHED IN: 2008

ISBN-13: 978-0-9724121-3-1

Ages: Young Adult & Up

Reviewed by Billy Burgess

 

I was very impressed by this book, reading it in only two nights. The author, John Royce, has beautifully written a wonderful epic that combines fantasy with history, a mix between Harry Potter, the Lord of the Rings and the Time Machine. He uses his great knowledge of the history of horses to give us the first adventure of the Legend of the Great Horse. The dialogue and descriptions are cleverly written to entertain and educate both young adults and adults.

The main character is a teenager named Meagan, and she is a horse lover. Being an animal lover myself, I was instantly connected to her. You are hooked within the first few pages, as Meagan loses a loved one and gains a new friend, a palomino foal that she name’s Promise. But Promise isn’t like other horses, she is the Great Horse – a fallen angel from the time of Adam & Eve. Due to financial reasons, the Foal is sent to live on a pasture until she is old enough to be ridden. During this time, Meagan meets the mysterious Mrs. Bridgestone. Mrs. Bridgestone tells Meagan about the legend of the great horse and that she believes Promise is the great horse. Mrs. Bridgestone wants the horse for her own. Three years passes by and Meagan rides Promise for the first time. Magical, long white wings stretch out of Promise, flying Meagan back in time where she meets cavemen, Romans, monks, knights and other life-threatening dangers.

Eclipsed By Shadow is a fast, action-packed adventure from start to the heart pounding cliffhanger. The author did a marvelous job blending history and fantasy together in this first book of the trilogy. Fans of horse books and fantasy adventures will enjoy reading this. Once you finish reading the final page, you’ll be longing for the next installment.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

A bit of LA Candy

If you loved The Hills, you will love Lauren Conrad’s debut novel LA Candy, the first in a series of three … the ending definitely left you hanging for book number two.

Sadly(?) I was really excited about the release of Lauren’s book and was ecstatic to be able to get my hands on an advance copy … I read it that weekend because it’s an easy read and I just love trashy novels, not that Lauren is trashy just so we’re clear, she’s not, I’m a fan!

Los Angeles (the City of Angels) is all about the sweet life: hot clubs, cute guys, designer … everything.  Nineteen year old Jane Roberts and her BFF, Scarlett, can’t wait to start living it up.  And when a TV producer wants them to star in his new series, a ‘reality version fo Sex and the City’, they can hardly believe their luck.  Their own show?  Free designer clothes? Access to LA’s most exclusive clubs? Yes, please!

The heroine of the story is Jane Roberts, most notable for her sweet nature and innocence (sound familiar?).  It’s definitely a written version of The Hills but it’s from a ‘behind the scenes’ perspective, so we get to learn a bit more about the reality of being a ‘reality tv star’ – not that I could ever truly grasp the reality of that myself – such as having to think about what you’re going to wear so you can be miked up properly, waiting to walk into a room until the camera’s are set up, etc.  It certainly takes away any sense of spontaneity.

I think the book could have gone a little more extreme with it’s scenes; I guess you could say it was a ’safe’ storyline – I wonder who the ghost writers were?  It will not win any literary prizes but it’s an enjoyable read and will be perfect on a winter escape or curled up on the sofa with a hot chocolate.

Her author’s pic on the back jacket has her looking perfectly made up with not a hair out of place and very serious!

Lauren continues with her wholesome brand trajectory since leaving the Hills with a recent message on her website confirming that she is launching a brand new line for Kohl’s Department stores in October, the LC Lauren Conrad line.  She says it is chic Californian style.

Available now.  Harper Collins:  RRP$19.99

Love,
Sassi
Your Pop Culture Gossip Girl

Monday, July 13, 2009

Storms come and go

“Storms come and go”: Bashar Assad (Syria’s President); (July 11, 2009)

 

            During the gathering of Arab States’ leaders in Beirut on April 2002, Bashar Assad said: “Storms come and go but if State’s rights and fundamentals of independence and liberty go then they are gone for ever.  We cannot ask the world community to pressure Israel to return land for peace if the Arab States are not doing their homework and staying steadfast and consistent.”

            Hafez Assad died in June 10, 2000 after over 30 years of reign.  Bashar was appointed President in June 18 for 7 years after revising a clause in the Constitution on age limits: Bashar was 35 and the constitution required the President to be 40 or over.  He proclaimed in a speech: “I am not after any position and will not shirk any responsibility.  A position is not a goal but a mean for achieving goals. If we have no sense of responsibility then a position becomes power for encouraging lawlessness and embezzlement.

 

            Bashar Assad was born in September 1965 in a traditional family; he was the third child of a large family. Bashar became an officer in the army in 1985 and then received his diploma in eye medicine in 1992 from the University of Damascus and resumed higher specialization at Western Eye in London. The elder son Bassel died in a car accident in January 1994 which prompted Bashar to return to Syria; he headed the committee of computing and information sciences.  Bashar visited the Jeita Grotto in Lebanon when he was 9 years old.

            Bashar lives with his family in an apartment and commute to the Presidential Palace; he walks the streets and mingles with the people.  He knew more Lebanese deputies than Syrian deputies before he became Syria’s President because his older brother Bassel had a wide network of connections in Lebanon.  Bashar knew Nabih Berry, head of Lebanon Parliament, since 1985 and many of the gatherings were done in company of the Syrian General Muhammad Nassif.  He also knew Suleiman Frangieh and Talal Erslan.  Bashar had met President Lahoud in 1996 when Lahoud was army chief who complained about the interference of many Syrian officers and named a few of these officers.

            Bashar visited Lebanon officially in March 3, 2002 and he intentionally landed in the airport and the protocols of two independent States were applied.  This official visit was meant to confirm Syria’s full recognition of Lebanon’s sovereignty.

 

            In February 14, 2005, President Assad was giving an interview to Seymour Hirsh when the news of Rafic Hariri’s assassination was relayed to him; he knew that this assassination was planned to force the application of UN resolution 1559.

            In March 4, Bashar announced in the Syrian Parliament his decision to with draw the troops from Lebanon. He admitted of errors committed in Lebanon by excluding contacts with many Lebanese political factions and many of the beneficiaries of Syria’s presence turned over their coat when Syria was pressured by the US and France to withdraw.  By November 10, 2005 Bashar had to give a national speech asserting that the price of resisting foreign pressures is far lower than succumbing to anarchy and declared Syria’s readiness to oppose foreign interventions to changing of its regime.  Bashar said: “Globalization is ignoring the civilizations and destinies of people; this is the best opportunity for the Arab people to coordinate their policies to affecting change.

 

In June 8, 2006 Bashar Assad sent a letter to the meeting of the Lebanese “Table of Dialogue” designed to study a strategic defensive plan saying: “Syria has no problem of opening an Embassy in Lebanon.  The distance between Beirut and Damascus is shorter than Damascus to its closest main city Homs.  Syria is ready as long as this demand is not attached to any foreign pressures and conditions.  Syria is ready to resolve all border disputes that are not under Israeli occupation such as the Sheba3a Farms”  The Syrian President went on “Syria has more cards to influence Lebanon after the withdrawal of its army (April 2005).  Previously we had to deal with all the negative aspects of the mandate.  We know now that Syria’s actual presence was not the main problems to Lebanon’s current dilemma.  The decision to withdraw our army from Lebanon was not hard but the circumstances were.  When a large portion of the Lebanese citizens started to imagine that Syria was the main problem for the assassination of Rafic Hariri then every Syrian citizen was wounded deeply. 

            If you ever ask any Syrian soldier whether he would have liked to remain or return to Lebanon then he would refuse this hardest of assignments. Syria would never relinquish its duty to preserve the integrity of the State of Lebanon when pressured by foreign interests.  When Lebanon is no longer after “foreign western mothers” for political support then Lebanon will enjoy a par status with Syria. Syria has proven during difficult periods in the region that it can be on a par status with France and the USA.  I personally visited Lebanon by plane in 2002 and I listened to the Lebanese anthem and I discussed the issue of diplomatic relations.  Is my visit not a practical recognition of Lebanon as an independent State?”

 

            President Bashar Assad learned two golden rules in international politics. First, the superpowers tend to convince smaller States that they are weak and need badly their aid.  The superpowers claim that smaller States have no valuable products to trade so that State logic and values cannot be exchanged in the market.  “We in Syria we won the battle because we were convinced that we had a priceless cause”.  Second, superpowers take no account of other States except when in need.  “When superpowers realize that a State can contribute to its interest then the past “misunderstandings” are forgotten”.

 

            After meeting with Russia Putine, Bashar said “Who attempt to isolate Syria will realize that he is isolating himself from the Middle East issues”. In fact, France and the USA are diligently communicating with the Syrian regime and exchanging ambassadors.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Jim & Casper Go To Church

“Is this what Jesus told you guys to do?” A question that I believe all church leaders should consistently ask themselves.  Buzzwords like ‘relevant’ and ‘authentic’ sound-off frequently in many church planning and staff meetings, but are we?  Beyond that, is our form and function connecting with people in their real life world?

These are things I wrestle with personally as a vocational ministry guy.  In ‘doing’ church the all-American way, am I part of the problem?  Does what I do matter?  Where I know my life matters is in the relationships I have.  The friendships and encounters I get to be a part of in my work as a worship guy matter…and sometimes make a difference.

So I land here…that I’ll work diligently right where God has placed me…and love the people I get to be around.  Then I’ll try to use whatever influence I might have to move towards real relationships and honest ministry, reaching real people in the real world…because that’s what Jesus told us to do.

I love the author’s challenge to church leaders and attenders, to visit other churches as an outsider, often.  In my years of touring, I’ve had the opportunity to be in hundreds of different churches, and I feel that it remains important to keep a fresh perspective on if what we do in church is actually doing what Jesus wants us to do.

I would recommend that church leaders read this book to challenge us and dislodge us from comfort zones and perceived realities.  I think that this book is also a good read for Christians who have been attending their church for years.  Let the words of an outsider change the way we think about and approach community and church so that we can actually meet people where they are and maybe even love on them a bit.  As for me?  I’m going to keep asking:

“Is this what Jesus told me to do?”

Publisher’s Info:

Jim Henderson pays people to go to church. In fact, he made national news when he “rented” a soul for $504 on E-Bay after its owner offered an “open mind” to the highest bidder. In Jim & Casper Go to Church, Hendrson hires another atheist–Matt Casper–to visit ten leading churches with him and give the “first impression” perspective of a non-believer. What follows is a startling dialogue between an atheist and a believer seeing church anew through the eyes of a skeptic, and the development of an amazing relationship between two men with diametrically opposing views of the world who agree to respect each others’ space. Foreword by George Barna.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Book Review: Rogue by Danielle Steel

Maxine Williams loved being married to millionaire Blake, he was a great entrepreneur, brilliant and a great person. The problem was that he wasn’t as good at being a husband as he was a businessman, so Maxine left with their 3 children in tow. The pair are still friends, and the children get to see both their mum and dad as much as they want, although they don’t want their parents ending up with anyone else! So problems arise when Maxine meets fellow doctor Charles, the kids aren’t happy and they’re even unhappier when Blake falls in love as well. But when a tragedy strikes, Maxine and Blake are thrown together once more, and she begins to wonder if The Rogue himself has changed. How will things work out for the pair?

Danielle Steel is one of the most prolific authors of our time, with an amazing 76 books to her name (as of Jan. 2009). She’s read worldwide, has had many books turned into TV films and is one of the world’s most read authors. So I was intrigued when this book turned up on my doorstep as I had never read any of Steel’s books before. I took them to be for the slightly older reader, a book that had a predictable ending and probably not something that is my cup of tea. Rogue was released in the UK in paperback in July 2009, and features a nice white, black and turquoise cover which looks nice and modern, and something I wouldn’t mind picking up off of a shelf. I eagerly began Rogue, interested to see what my opinion of it would be.

Well, I finished it within a day because it was very easy reading, and I was right – the outcome was entirely predictable. HOWEVER that doesn’t mean it wasn’t an enjoyable read and the story along the way to the ending wasn’t all that bad either! One thing that annoyed me a tad is nothing to do with the story itself at all – it is the rather large font used in the book, so it looks a lot longer than it really! I prefer a smaller text in my books so I found myself whizzing through Rogue in no time, and before I knew it, I was at the end. I don’t know if that is deliberate of the publishers to make the book a bit thicker for connsumers but it did irritate me a tad, although I suppose it isn’t that big a deal in the scheme of things.

The characters were all quite stereo-type American people. Blake is a self-made millionaire, womaniser, friendly and loveable guy who is still best friends with his ex-wife, a great dad to his children and charity donater too. Maxine is a successful doctor dealing with problem children (suicides etc), has a nanny who is her best friend, 3 lovely children, and a great relationship with her ex-husband. The only thing either is missing is a lovelife (see where we’re going here?!) and this book is their quest for happiness. I liked Blake and Maxine very much, there’s no reason NOT to like them to be honest! They’re well written, well developed and considering the pace of the story, we do get to know them well enough to care about them. The 3 children aren’t seen too much, but are typical of children of their age group, with Steel covering a couple of issues in here as well to bring them into frontline plot a tad more and to bring together Blake and Maxine for a moment as well of course!!

As I said, you can guess how this is all going to end within the first few pages, but I enjoyed the journey. The book explores different relationships, how circumstances can change over time and more importantly different kinds of love as well. The inclusion of a new male into an established family was well done and I absolutely loathed the character of Charles – if any man spoke to my children like that, he’d be out on his ear! It was a funny look at “step-families” in that respect because it did seem unlikely, but Steel doesn’t rush this even though its pretty inevitable how its going to conclude with that relationship! We don’t see as much of Blake’s relationships, as Maxine is the main character of the book but what we do see is enough to draw conclusions from.

While this was a very pleasant and easy read, I won’t be rushing out to pick up another Danielle Steel book! I really don’t think that at 23 years old, I am Steel’s main demographic and I imagine quite a few of my lovely library users would love this book, but it just wasn’t my cup of tea. It was all a little predictable, fast and cliche for me to fully enjoy it, but there are people out there who love just that – after all, she wouldn’t have sold 580 million copies of her books if people didn’t like them, would she?! Rogue is a good way to spend a day by the pool perhaps, but don’t go into it expecting too much as you’ll be disappointed! A fair read, good enough but just not for me!

Thank you to the publishers CORGI for sending us a copy to review.

Rating: 3/5

Friday, July 10, 2009

The Looking Glass Wars, by Frank Beddor

“He’d transformed her memories of a world alive with hope and possibility and danger into make-believe, the foolish stuff of children.”

So says Alice Liddell, or rather, Alyss, about Charles Dodgson’s (Lewis Carroll’s) new book, Alice in Wonderland. Dodgson has collected all of Alyss’ shared recollections about a place from her earliest memories and turned them into…ptui!…popular fiction for young adults. He’s even spelled her name wrong.

She’s very upset about this.

I wasn’t too happy either.

In The Looking Glass Wars, Frank Beddor gives us the first installment of a series of tales about Wonderland, from the other side of the looking glass. His Wonderland is a real place, an alternate dimension from the Earth we know, where imagination is the power to create reality. Alyss is the presumptive heir to the throne, the next Queen of Hearts, until her fairytale future is shattered by a bloody coup engineered by her Aunt Redd, a seriously disturbed royal who didn’t meet the sanity standard for queenship. Heads roll, and Alyss flees into exile, falling through a watery portal into Victorian England, where she’s eventually adopted by the good Reverend Liddell and his family, her memories of Wonderland fading over the years.

After her altercation with Mr. Dodgson, Alyss spends another few years in limbo until she’s discovered by a long-lost retainer from Wonderland who’s been searching for her ever since they were separated during their flight from Redd. He arrives just in time to avert Alyss’ impending marriage to a British royal. Together, they return to Wonderland to set things right, but Redd’s firmly established on the throne, and unseating her won’t be easy.

Sigh. I just got done beating up on Orson Scott Card for trying to “reimagine” classic literature. I guess that’s just one of my pet peeves. The Looking Glass Wars isn’t a bad story. It’s well-written and showcases Mr. Beddor’s creativity in his vision of Wonderland. Unlike the original Alice in Wonderland, though, there’s no poetry or profound feeling of strangeness that immerses the reader in a completely alien realm. If anything, this Wonderland might seem a little too familiar to anybody who’s been to the movies in the last five or ten years. It tells a story with a beginning, middle, and end, but it never took hold of me. It was pleasant, but not compelling.

Yes, this is a “young adult” book, but I’ve still got enough kid in me to get wrapped up in a good kids’ story, when I find one.

I’ve Got a Bad Feeling About This: The Penguin Speak paperback copy I bought was a nice product. The cover had a coppery sheen to it, the backcover copy told me everything I needed to know about the story inside, and the artwork was attractive. Unfortunately, the depictions of the card soldiers, including the descriptive text within the story, painted a picture uncomfortably like the droid troopers from the Star Wars movies. I was waiting for one of them to sound off with a cheery, “Roger-roger,” but they remained mercifully silent. There are interior color plates with more cool artwork, very pretty and creepy in an American McGee’s Alice sort of way.

Spies Like Us: One of the reimaginings that I thought was fun and mostly worked was casting the Mad Hatter as a sort of covert agent/bodyguard, part of a network of agents known collectively as “The Millinery.” Lots of sharp objects are tossed about, including hats that morph into nasty, razor-edged weapons ala Oddjob from the James Bond movies. Alyss picks up a personal bodyguard toward the end of the story by the name of Homburg Molly, who’s a very focused apprentice spy and one of the few characters not cribbed from Alice in Wonderland, which may be one reason I found her so appealing. The poor Cheshire Cat appears as a humorless cybernetic assassin on Redd’s team who loses his nine lives one-by-one, mostly at the hands of his homicidal mistress.

Up in Smoke: There are multiple Caterpillars in the story, and they’re all mystic sages of some sort (nobody who plays around with the Alice stories seems to be able to think of anything else to do with them), but as in the original, they’re not much help.  We still have no idea what’s getting smoked in that hookah.

Bottom Line: The Looking Glass Wars is an interesting “reimagining” of the Alice in Wonderland mythos, but it fell a little flat for me. There’s some very creative worldbuilding. The secondary characters created by Beddor for this story are a bright spot, and I expect them to grow into star players by the end of this series. Not a bad read, especially for an older tween, but, for the love of all that’s good and true, introduce them to Lewis Carroll’s immortal works first.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Book Review: Watership Down

Who knows how I’ve managed to miss this book for so long.  It’s just my sort of thing.  And I’m a little annoyed that nobody bothered to mention it to me before now!  But oh well, at least I’m caught up.  I finally read Watership Down, which was not at all about a naval battle, as the title made me assume.  It was all about bunnies.

Dan can’t figure out why anyone would want to read a 500 page novel about bunnies.  But they’re very complex creatures, or so I’ve come to learn after reading this book.  But I also realized how much we have to learn from reflecting on nature.

The Psalmist tells us “The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork” (19:1).  All creation tells about its creator.  In the New Testament, we find out that we can’t claim ignorance about God, because all of nature is positively shouting all kinds of truth about him: “For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).

So, why should it be surprising that a book about rabbits, faithful to the way rabbits live in nature, shouldn’t reveal a lot about ourselves and about our God?

I honestly don’t know much about this author, aside from the preface to the book.  I didn’t do my homework for this one, since our plans for an upcoming trip to Italy are taking up all my spare time.  But I do know that the author did a lot of research about rabbits, so I expect that his representation of rabbits and their daily lives was fairly accurate, minus all that talking stuff.

The plot is fairly simple, one that a child could understand.  Which is why the book could be mistaken for a Harry Potter length children’s book.  But it’s not merely a children’s book because adults have much to gain from reading it.

A group of rabbits break off from a warren to form their own warren but discover they have one huge problem: no female rabbits (does).  The entire book surrounds the conflict in finding does. 

Along the way, we learn about rabbit tradition and the different types of warrens that they encounter.  There are different leadership styles, ones that mirror human kind, of course.  And there are also admirable, sacrificial acts by brave leaders on behalf of the weaker members of the warren. 

One of the most fascinating aspects of the book was the introduction of rabbit language, terms that only rabbits use to describe things that only rabbits need to describe.  For example, the rabbits have a unique word for the time when they leave the rabbit holes to go outside.  It’s a word only a rabbit would need of course.  The words are gradually woven into the story and soon, you find yourself comfortable with the rabbit language. 

I haven’t seen the movie yet, but that’s next on the list, as soon as I coerce Dan to read the book.

Now if only there were an equivalent book about cats!

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Review: Ali Smith's Like

Like, Ali Smith’s first and least-known novel is a riddle of enigmas told in two parts that compete and complete with the other: the first, set in ‘the present’ introduces us to Amy Shone, raising soon-to-be eight-year-old Kathleen ‘Kate’ in and around the north of Scotland.

Amy and Kate live a hand-to-mouth existence, moving from one place to the next, for reasons not entirely or immediately made clear.   Amy is English, with a posh accent that suggests an upper-class upbringing and despite a well-educated mind, she is unable to read.   The how and the why of Amy and Kate’s circumstances are pieced together by clues Smith cautiously lets fall, like breadcrumbs in a forest.   One of Smith’s major strengths as a writer is in not spelling it all out for her audience and Like is no exception.

At the beginning of the novel, Amy and Kate have just moved into a caravan on a site where Amy has been employed by owner Angus to answer phones and other odd jobs.   Much of the narrative follows young Kate as she settles into her new home and fits in (or out) with her classmates.   Kate proves to be an inquisitive, independent child, old beyond her years, yet deeply innocent and intuitive.   Like any only child, growing up without material possessions or a solid home, Kate lives very much in her own mind, exploring the beach on her own, ‘acquiring’ toys and books from her school that she keeps hidden from Amy (whom she only refers to as ‘Amy’), or paying occasional visits to a friend’s home to watch television.

Amy and Kate stand out to their neighbors not simply as a small, poor family without a father in sight, but their distinct English accents throw them into sharp relief on a social level.    Amy does not discuss her past, where she is from or how she came to be in Scotland to anyone, even herself.    Angus, her employer and landlord is clearly smitten with her, in a Brief Encounter fashion.  She is described as being slim with dark hair while Kate is fair-haired.   On one occasion a stranger remarks how beautiful Kate is, how like a movie star.    A comment not without significance we learn much later.

On the exterior, Amy is polite, but distant.   She suffers from moments of absent-mindedness or even possibly, suicidal tendencies.   The first paragraphs of the story show Amy at a railway station, standing too close to the edge, pulling herself back at the last minute, for Kate’s sake.   She remembers trying to abandon Kate several times when she was still a baby.   When Kate asks about the circumstances of her birth, Amy tells her a string of fairytales but one rings most strangely: how she just found her at a hospital and decided to take her home.  Amy will later reveal that she has no birth certificate for Kate.  When Kate asks about her father, Amy dismisses the question as irrelevant: she never knew him, doesn’t know if he is alive or not, so what does it matter?  The possibility that Kate may not be Amy’s birth daughter is given strength in these moments, but no real clues come together until the end of the first half.

Amy’s illiteracy is relatively recent in her adult life.   She makes odd attempts at reading words in newspapers or one of Kate’s books, but they no longer make sense to her.    She seems to live aloof to them, going about her work and caring for Kate without complaint or need for anything better in her life.   Like Kate, Amy draws strength from a deeply felt inner life, albeit one that is completely hidden to those around her.

Throughout the first section, Amy’s thoughts conjure images of an absent obsession; what is never said is often repeated.   There is a ghost haunting Amy, or the idea of one at least.   Her life in Scotland is part of it.  Metaphors of fire and burning, the destruction or purification, even preservation they may bring.  In the first chapter, an old song is stuck in her head:

Always something there to remind me

always something there to remind me

I was born

to love you

and I will ne

ver be free

you’ll alwasybe apart of me

Amy does not like to dwell on or articulate what has brought her to her current circumstances; Smith’s writing does not allow Amy to live in her past.   Instead, Smith, with mystery-laden economy, allows us to guess at the details of Amy’s life through visits to her estranged and successful parents (her mother is a TV chef and her father a retired academic) and a brief, but emotionally charged interview with a reporter researching a What Ever Happened To story about Amy’s old friend and long-missing actress, Aisling McCarthy.

The novel shifts gears in its second half, introducing us to the one and only journal of Aisling (Ash) McCarthy and it is in this half that, while ostensibly to enlighten us about the mysterious actress, we learn more about the equally mysterious Amy.   Ash’s journal serves to flesh out Amy’s story and fill in the details of her character and history.  Such a conceit does weaken this section somewhat, but Smith’s narrative skills deliver in Ash a character of such rich curiosity and longing that following in her hollow pursuit of the elusive Amy gives their shared story a glowing, delicious substance.

Her journal begins only a few short years after her relationship with Amy ends: now a successful actress of edgy independent films she has made with an eccentric auteur (think Fassbinder, only English), she has gone to visit her father in Scotland, and her writing bounces back and forth between her memories of Amy and her present.

Fiercely intelligent, Scottish and motherless, Ash is raised in an all-male household, including her philandering shop owner father and her two older identical twin brothers.   Ash is, perhaps understandably, a bit of a tomboy and, as a precocious teen, already aware of her complicated sexuality.  Even before she meets Amy, she has a delicate crush on another student, an American girl who turns out to be less than Ash would wish for.   Fate is literally around the corner though as Amy and her parents, on holiday, have just taken up residence in a hotel next door to Ash’s house.

In one of the novel’s most breathtaking moments, Ash, waking from a nap in her backyard, catches her first glimpse of Amy, who has been lying in a tree, watching her for some time.  Without a single word of introduction, Amy tells her:

You’ll never guess. I just saw the most beautiful thing. There

was a butterfly drinking from the corner of your eye just a

moment ago.  Nymphalis io. They’re quite rare this far north.

My mouth fell open.  I looked at her, hanging balanced above me

in the branches of the apple tree.  I said, Really?  Really and truly?

Promise, she said.

In this one moment, we learn all we will really ever know about Amy: her stunning intelligence, single-mindedness and her almost-unspoken fixation with Ash, that in the first half of the book she gives a brief glimpse of in a story she tells to Kate.

The story is told while Amy and Kate are staying overnight at Amy’s parent’s home and Kate spies a picture of Amy and Ash, taken many years before.  Kate wants a story about the picture.  Instead, Amy tells her about a girl who went to a river to catch a fish.  Casting for the prettiest fish she finds, she catches a beautiful girl instead.  Not knowing what to do, the fisher girl is bereft when the other girl just vanishes.  She searches high and low but cannot find her.  She makes herself a promise to search ‘her whole life, if it took that long, until she found the one she’d caught again.’

When Kate wonders why the fisher girl couldn’t simply cast for another fish, Amy tells her, simply, no, that, like Kate seeking stories, she just wanted the ‘first one.’

We do not know it at the time, but Amy has just revealed something of her feelings for the mercurial and flighty Ash, who, by her own testimony, pursues affair after affair while Amy remains largely unattached throughout the years Ash knows her.

This first meeting, with Amy up a tree (forbidden fruit?), watching the sleeping Ash gives us more clues about their relationship as well: Amy’s ‘superior’ social status as well as her somewhat predatory nature: the very next day Amy, along with her parents, will show up at Ash’s home unexpectedly to take Ash with them on their tour of Scotland – Amy’s idea.   Though Ash is stunned, Amy’s resolve wins out and the two spend an enigmatic summer together that, according to Ash’s journal, ends up being more frustrating in its lack of resolve.

Amy closes up at odd, unpredictable moments, and at others proves to be strangely macabre.  Upon a visit to a Neolithic burial ground, she tells Ash they are beautiful places and that death is ‘so fascinating.’  For Amy, there is a bit of romance in death, which suits her cerebral nature; she is absorbed by information she has gleaned from all her father’s books and spouts facts from them to Ash during their trip.  These facts do not always impress Ash, but they serve a different purpose for her: by giving away what she knows, Amy is trying to tether Ash to her, taking a kind of ownership that is familiar to anyone who understands something of domination and submission.   Though Amy could never be described as a dominatrix, her intellect is a kind of whip that she uses to either bring someone closer (like Ash ) or keep them at a distance (everyone else).

One of the more telling moments of this journey occurs when they visit a waterfall and, leaning over the railing to watch, Amy asks Ash a question that sounds more like a dare: one that is worth remembering at the end of the book:

If I dared you to jump, would you jump? She said.  Oh sure,

I yelled back, of course I would.  She put her hand against my

head to shout through it into my ear.  One minute you’d still be

safe here, she shouted against the noise, the next you’d be nothing

but air and movement, the secret of it would flash before your eyes,

you’d know it all.  Yeah, but then you’d be dead, I shouted back.

Ash is haunted by this moment at the waterfall and later, cannot sleep.  It is one of the first of several references to death that flows through Ash’s journal.

The Scottish episode is a brief but simple primer to the girls’ relationship: though they are never explicitly ‘friends’ during this period, there is a sense of growing attraction, of the push and pull of hormones and the need for companionship.  Amy’s quiet intensity draws Ash along in her unspoken desire for ‘the first one,’ yet being on two sides of a social divide, there is little the two actually have in common.  Amy is on a quest to prove herself superior to her parents: her talkative, self-involved mother and her taciturn, intellectual father, a man whose library she is in the process of consuming.  Knowledge is Amy’s weapon and her ambition is its general: her focus never varies save for her attraction to Ash, an attraction her ambition ultimately betrays.

Ash, on the other hand, while the more open of the two, is directionless.  Ash’s scattered thoughts keep referring to death: her dead mother, dead celebrities and, more randomly, air crash victims.  She is raised Catholic, but has too many questions her teachers will not answer.  She worries about the existence of God.   Following Amy’s departure, she finds herself at odds in school thanks to a brief but entirely sexual relationship with another (female) student and even a young teacher.  Ash, unlike Amy, has no particular ambition or need to please or proof herself to anyone.  Like Amy, she is a solemn reader. There is something of a blank slate about Ash: carefree as she is, Amy has left a mark on her that she cannot quite erase.

Something is coming to Ash, but she isn’t sure what:

The haunting possibilities.  I shook my head.  Something

was beyond me. I couldn’t see what it was, how to get to it.

Something was slipping past, barely sensed, the vague outline

of it gliding down the stairs and through the shut front door, goodbye…

…something wouldn’t leave me alone, something or somebody

was always at my heels wherever I went, whatever I did, or was

it just ahead of me, mocking my moves before I even made them.

It is after this that Ash receives a letter from Amy, a letter that is not so much a letter as a command, a pull on the invisible tether between the two that sends Ash on a free fall journey to Amy’s university; the letter is a prophecy of sorts, a promise that will not be kept or broken.  The letter’s finale emphasizes Amy’s view of Ash as something otherworldly:

My grained Ash,

are you running like sparks through the stubble?

‘Sparks through the stubble’ is taken directly from Solomon 3:1-9:

In the time of their visitation they will shine forth, and will run

like sparks through the stubble.

The passage refers to God’s ‘elite,’ that he watches over, his righteous coterie of saints that Amy has a particular obsession with.   Though Amy herself is hardly religious, her rooms at the university, as well as her room in her parent’s home, are decorated with popular images of angels and saints.  She has a particular knowledge of them, but there is no indication that she ‘believes’ or not.   Ash even writes about Amy’s ascetic eccentricities – such as not eating, since ‘eating is impure’ and how Amy developed problems with not having her period ‘just like the medieval saints.’   Amy carves her life like a figure etched in soap: clean and pure, desiring no blemishes to herself or her record and having wild, unpredictable and unruly Ash in her life dares to upset that balance.

Ash’s beliefs on the other hand, are always in question, but as a child she prayed regularly.   Amy even remarks on Ash’s Catholicism, a bit enviously, how fortunate Ash is to know the true value of sin.   Amy’s enormous trivia-laden intellect may speak more of the classic university archetype: those so over-educated, they almost know nothing.

Ash, in a moment of anger and rejection, will think as much:

She was ridiculous.  She was patronizing and ridiculous.

She was patronizing, and ridiculous, and so clever that she

was stupid.

But Ash is the intelligent observer of Amy’s peculiarities: she witnesses Amy’s academic rise with some amusement and awe that is perpetually tempered by desire and distance.

Finding herself suddenly at Amy’s university, without money or a plan of action, Ash, even in a heightened state of excitement and confusion, maps her way to Amy with determination, finding her almost by chance.  Amy responds without surprise, her slight yank on Ash’s tether having successfully drawn her in, yet from the first there is coolness to Amy’s demeanor: she is in her own element here, on the path of out-distancing her mother and father, a story Ash has no part in.

Ash’s journal is a curiosity of confessions: she calls it her ‘liary’ since all diaries lie and even suggests Amy’s journals were never so honest – their evidence being boxed up in her father’s attic.   How she came to be in possession of Amy’s personal journals spins into the heart – and heat – of the story as Ash becomes better acquainted with the adult Amy, who, with her growing professional stature, comes to avoid (public) contact with her working class friend.

Her journal is a literal chronicle of her obsession with Amy and the ‘half-life’ of her existence at Amy’s university environment: finding work in a library that Amy frequents, her relationship with Simone, another student who finds Amy a bore and encourages Ash to explore her own talents as well as a study of her relationship with her father and the world she grew up in.   Ash never allows herself to be lonely, but, like Amy, her most private thoughts are what define her.

Not long after Ash’s arrival at Amy’s university (Cambridge, likely, Ali Smith also attended), Ash stumbles upon an old, rotted and boarded up theater.   She takes Amy to show her and together they wander the stage in the darkness, shouting songs and poems to one another, blind in the dark:

Me standing stage left, her standing stage right, as far apart as

we dared go in the dark, calling at each other in the rich decay

of it, with the dead history in the air.

This is their moment, in front of their only audience, ignoring the world around them, delighting in the unseen, blind to their own possibilities, uncaring.  They keep peering through the shadows for one another, assured of the others’ presence, always circling, never quite touching.

What gives Like its real punch though are the questions it poses and leaves the reader to answer; Smith’s respect for her audience is telling: she’s going to let us fill in the blanks and the story is all the better for it.   She never explicitly tells us anything – we are left to infer and puzzle and, especially in the second half, wonder how reliable a narrator is the mercurial Ash.   Fortunately, Smith keeps the motivations relatively simple.  Like can be see as a tale of unrequited love gone wrong, a Revenger’s tragedy, or even to some extent (given the title), a tale of amour l’fou or, possible, a folie e deux.

As a first novel, Like is a rich, calculated conundrum, where we, the reader, are witness to the alienating affects of self-absorption as it consumes Amy and Ash in very similar ways, a literary feat Smith would put to greater use and to greater acclaim with Hotelworld. There is little of the experimental genius of that novel here, yet there is no need: unlike Hotelworld, we are given unprecedented, albeit limited, access into the imaginations of two equally brilliant, vexing and inescapably tragic, intertwined lives.

Ali Smith is the author of Like, Hotelworld, The Accidental and the short story collections, Free Love and Other Stories, The Whole Story and Other Stories and The First Person and Other Stories. Her most recent novel is part of the Canongate Mythology series: Girl Meets Boy, The Myth of Iphis.