Friday, October 30, 2009

Book Review: ESV Study Bible

Crossway’s ESV Study Bible is the subject of our review this week.

For the next three days we shall look at the ESV Study Bible and consider both the Bible text and some of its features.

Today we shall briefly look at the translation.

The ESV is an essentially literal (el) translation. This means that it seeks to translate the Bible text from the original languages word for word. The English translation seeks to accurately translate each word so as to be faithful to the writings of the original penmen.

As an essentially literal translation the ESV follows the tradition of the King James Version. It seeks to preserve both the faithfulness to the original text as well as the rhythm and beauty that has characterized essentially literal translations. To be honest, not all el translations have given a smooth reading text. The ESV does a good job of keeping a relatively smooth read.

The ESV also reminds me of the KJV. This is a good thing, because the KJV set a standard for beauty, structure and rhythm. Bible translators are wise to keep the philosophy of the KJV translators in mind. The ESV has done this in many ways.

Having read in the ESV a good bit over the last several months I have found it to be unfamiliar in the sense that it is not exactly the same as the KJV. On the other hand, it is very familiar in that it has a similar “feel” to it. When one reads it they know that they are reading the Bible and not some neighborhood kids paraphrase. It has much majesty of tone and style. It is also easy to read.

I foresee the ESV Study Bible being a great tool to help many people.

The ESV Study Bible that I received was quite good in quality. It was in a nice box, quite unlike most Bible boxes. This box seemed to be made for the purpose of storage as well as shipping and stocking in stores. The Bible I received was one of the Tru-Tone bindings. The cover was nicely done and stitched at most of the pressure points so that the Bible would stay together longer than most Bibles. That is an impressive thing to me, and I am usually poorly impressed by the binding of most Bibles.

Another impressive thing is the introductory material. Whether one opens the Bible to read the introduction to the Old Testament, or the introduction to a particular book of the Bible, this material is great. It is quite comprehensive, covering many of the major controversies surrounding the matter at hand, treating them fairly, and then introducing the material by giving us pertinent background information as well as literary information concerning what one will read soon. This is done in a scholarly, but easy to read manner.

Again, to this point I am well impressed with the ESV Study Bible.

In closing my review I want to consider two positives and one negative.

First the positive.

1. Balance. One of the things that stirs up much emotion is the subject of eschatology. The ESV Study Bible is balanced in this area. As I looked through the book of Revelation, its introduction, and various study notes I found the ESV to be a sort of non-partisan Bible. It’s not that the notes don’t take a certain position, but mostly the notes simply report and lets the reader decide what they should believe about the matter. Balance of this sort is good, because the major eschatological views are within the realm of orthodoxy. Instead of feeding the flames of controversy the notes allow a fair view of the issues before the reader and leave it at that.

2. Conviction. The doctrinal studies in the back of the Bible are very impressive. Though not a systematic theology, these doctrinal studies will be helpful to the reader who longs to learn more of the foundations of the Christian faith. The balance here is that the fundamental truths of Scripture are upheld. I must applaud those who wrote these notes.

Finally, the negative.

I wish there were a few more notes about textual issues. There are some textual issues that are mentioned, but I noticed that the Johannine Comma was simply omitted without reference to any textual data for or against it. As it is one of the most contested passages I was disappointed with that particular omission.

In the end I must give the ESV Study Bible five stars and thank God and Crossway for this gift to the church.

(This copy of the ESV Study Bible provided for review by Crossway Publishers.)

View all my reviews >>

Review: "Dawn's Early Light"

When I offered to review Laurie (L.C.) Lewis’s forthcoming novel, Dawn’s Early Light, I soon realized I was at a slight disadvantage: it’s the third volume in a sprawling historical Free Men and Dreamers saga, leading up to the War of 1812…and I hadn’t read the first two volumes. Fortunately, this story works as a “stand alone read,” thanks in part to the author’s helpful listing of all the various characters.

The saga begins after the Revolutionary War (around 1781), introducing us to characters from the first American-born generation, and there is even a small tie-in with Lucy Mack Smith and her family. As the author describes the first two volumes on her website:

“Dark Sky at Dawn, book one of Free Men and Dreamers, introduces the troubled characters–American, British, and slave–whose lives are caught up in this complex period. Europe was in tumult over Napoleon, and America was a hotbed of social and political divisiveness. Nearly bankrupt, the American military was under-manned and under-funded, requiring citizen-soldiers to leave their plows and hearths to fight. They marched off, filled with bravado and ballyhoo, but the British threat soon humbled them, nearly breaking their spirit. Twilight’s Last Gleaming, book two of the series, carries our characters into the early days of the war, highlighting the sacrifice and courage of the women as well as the men.”

This third volume, Dawn’s Early Light, continues the story of Jed Pearson as he prepares for the British invasion up the Potomac and Patuxent rivers, on their way to burn the Capital. He has a wife and sister, as well as an estate full of newly freed slaves, which he must make secure before he can heed the military call to serve his country again in her hour of need. While we are kept abreast of developments in Britain concerning two other families introduced earlier in Lewis’s series, the real focus of this story is on Jed and his wife.

When it came to visualizing the setting of the story as described by the author, I was happily not at a disadvantage. You see, I spent six years of my childhood in Bethesda, Maryland, and the family of one of my good friends during that period owned an estate-like home on the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay. As I read Dawn’s Early Light, I felt as if I were re-visiting places from my adolescence (though some 150 years earlier).

The book is very well-written, fast-paced, and fluid, despite the back and forth between America and England. The storyline is strong and, for the most part, the plot developments all worked (meaning they didn’t give me pause as a reader).

There was one exception. (Spoiler alert: Don’t read the rest of this paragraph, if you plan on reading the book.) I found it difficult to believe a pregnant woman would willingly put her baby at risk by riding for miles on a galloping horse into the battle area, simply to be sure her loved one was all right. But maybe that’s just me. I suffered miscarriages too easily.

As a lover of research, I came away most impressed by the amount of investigation and fact-finding Lewis has apparently undertaken, not only for this volume, but for the entire saga. And she is now at work on a fourth volume, so the research is doubtless continuing.

Finally, I must comment upon her expansive vocabulary. Since my blog is all about words, I couldn’t help noticing the author never got lazy with her descriptions, narrative, and dialogue. She’s an inspiration to all writers in this regard.

While Lewis’s first two volumes were published by Covenant, she has had to put this one out independently, but you can expect to find it on the shelves of Seagull by November 16th.

If you love historical fiction (and early U.S. History, in particular), Dawn’s Early Light and the entire Free Men and Dreamers series should help complete your Christmas list.

You've Got Mail Yet Again

A special thanks to Andrew Rogers at Zondervan for two review copies:

 

 

 

 

 

A Theology of John’s Gospel and Letters (BTNT) by Andreas J. Kostenberger as well as 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus: African Bible Commentary Series by Samuel M. Ngewa.  I was excited to look at Kostenberger’s Johnanine theology, and after seeing I am very impressed!  It is a massive work of scholarship and I am sure that it will be just as good as his privious commentary of John in the BECNT.  Reviews are forthcoming.

Also, two other books came in the mail, but  these I purchased.  The first, Story as History, History as Story: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History by Samuel Byrskog is one that I had on my wish list for sometime.  I finally saw used one at a good price so I snatched it up.  The second, God’s People in the Wilderness: The Church in Hebrews by O. Palmer Robertson is a book right up my alley.  If you notice, a recent post of mine dealt with this subject, so when I came across this little book I was excited to read through it.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

ESV Study Bible Review Part Two

Crossway’s ESV Study Bible is the subject of our review this week.

Today I shall focus on two issues: quality of binding and introductory material.

The ESV Study Bible that I received was quite good in quality.  It was in a nice box, quite unlike most Bible boxes.  This box seemed to be made for the purpose of storage as well as shipping and stocking in stores.  The Bible I received was one of the Tru-Tone bindings.  The cover was nicely done and stitched at most of the pressure points so that the Bible would stay together longer than most Bibles.  That is an impressive thing to me, and I am usually poorly impressed by the binding of most Bibles.

Another impressive thing is the introductory material.  Whether one opens the Bible to read the introduction to the Old Testament, or the introduction to a particular book of the Bible, this material is great.  It is quite comprehensive, covering many of the major controversies surrounding the matter at hand, treating them fairly, and then introducing the material by giving us pertinent background information as well as literary information concerning what one will read soon.  This is done in a scholarly, but easy to read manner.

Again, to this point I am well impressed with the ESV Study Bible.

(This copy of the ESV Study Bible provided for review by Crossway Publishers.)

MY SISTER'S KEEPER

MY SISTER’S KEEPER by JODI PICOULT  I read this book back in June, and am just now getting around to writing about it.  One of the main reasons that I wanted to read this was because the movie was coming out that same month.  Before knowing anything about the book, I had seen the trailer and was intrigued from that moment.  Thing is, I refuse to watch any movie adaptation of a book, unless I’ve read it first.  In my opinion, the book is always, always, better!  I have read 2 other novels by Jodi Picoult and everyone I have encountered that has read her books has proclaimed that this is her best one.  I was desperate to see what all the hype was about.  As always, I hate expecting anything.  However, this book did not disappoint me at all - with the exception of one thing.  I’m beginning to feel that Picoult’s books never quite fully satisfy me with their endings.  They don’t provide me with enough closure to feel like the endings left me with clarity.  I guess I could actually say that about a couple of books that I’ve read though.  Nonetheless, that fact does not take away from her story-telling throughout.  I just wish she gave a little bit more at the end of her stories.  In total, this is my third book of hers that I read, and there is another sitting on my shelf still untouched.  Therefore, I can’t say with great credibility that it was her best.  I actually think I may have liked Nineteen Minutes better.  Anyway in closing…although it’s been a little over 4 months since I read this, I still have yet to see the movie!  It’s ridiculous really.

Healing Emotions: Conversations with the Dalai Lama on Mindfulness, Emotions, and Health

Healing Emotions: Conversations with the Dalai Lama on Mindfulness, Emotions, and Health, Edited by Daniel Goleman (Shambhala, Boston & London, 1997).

“Can the mind heal the body? How are the brain, immune system, and emotions interconnected? What emotions are associated with enhanced well-being? How does mindfulness function in a medical context? Is there a biological foundation for ethics? How can death help us understand the nature of the mind?”

In the summer of 1991, ten well-known scientists, psychologists, meditation teachers and other scholars came together with the Dalai Lama in Dharamsala India “to grapple with these questions.” This book is a record of conversations that took place during this event—the Third Mind and Life Conference.

There are some, of course, who may say that the effort to understand reality through a dialogue between religion and science is misguided at best. But even if this were the case, Buddhism is not a religion in the ordinary sense of the term. One need not “believe in” the Buddha to practice Buddhism. For our beliefs, like our other attachments, are often what keep us from opening to reality, the miraculous emptiness that underlies the fundamental interdependence of all life.

What is unusual about Healing Emotions is the way in which it explores this “interdependence” through a continual questioning that expands our view of the world and explores relationships between things that we thought were unrelated. This should come as no surprise, however, since in the introduction we are told that “Buddhism has as principal aims the goal of transforming perception and experience and synchronizing mind and body.”

Healing Emotions explores the relationships between such subjects as cellular biology, stress, emotions, moods, headaches, immunology, visceral learning, self-esteem, virtue and morality, greed, mindfulness, death, self-acceptance, responsibility, consciousness, compassion, and much else. This thought-provoking book is a testament not only to the Dalai Lama’s far-reaching search for ways to better understand the many challenges facing us today, but also to his underlying “affection” for other human beings and their ideas and experiences.

“I believe that human affection is the basis … of human nature,” says the Dalai Lama. “Without that, you can’t get satisfaction or happiness as an individual; and without that foundation, the whole human community can’t get satisfaction either. In my day-to-day thinking, I always take into account the total environment, the whole community.”

Whether or not one believes that “affection” is the basis of human nature, it is becoming increasingly clear that the growing lack of genuine affection in modern life, of loving kindness toward oneself and others, is closely related to our lack of awareness of the “total environment.” And without this sense of the total environment—and the urgent sense of conscience that comes with it—any real transformation is next to impossible.

Healing Emotions: Conversations with the Dalai Lama on Mindfulness, Emotions, and Health

Monday, October 26, 2009

Winner- Extraordinary!!!

So, it was time for this little beauty.  There were only four commenters on it, so each one had a much stronger chance of winning of course.  I tried to guess which integer Random.org would have chosen, but I was way off.  I chose 1.  It chose…

So……. off I go again… (Cause I’m alwayson the go don’tcha know… hey, that rhymes better than it used to!– quick, name that movie that I just misquoted!)

Voila!  Kathy.  Again, I know a few,  off I went  (I’m really put off by this, aren’t I?   hee hee) to find out which Kathy will be receiving this great book…

And I don’t think I know her.  I don’t recognize this email addy.  So, unless someone has gotten a new one for web use, this is a newbie to me!  If so, welcome to Paradoxology, Kathy!

And, remember… this is the book you’ll be winning…  If you didn’t win, you can always hop on over to Random House and buy yourself a copy.

But wait!  There’s more!  Those who entered this little giveaway can take a deep breath… hold it…. hold it…

Hold it some more….

In addition to the fabulous copy I’ve already given away, I am giving away….

ANOTHER COPY!  Yes that’s right.  Not only will a lucky blog reader win one of these lovely hardcover books, TWO will win.  Yes, thanks to the generosity of Waterbrook’s Blogging for books crew (and my tiny house with no room on the shelf for very many more books), you have a second chance at this book!  Those who say there are no second chances are wrong!  There is no free lunch on this blog (you wouldn’t want it by the time it arrived anyway), but there ARE free books.  Loads and loads of lovely free books all due to the overwhelming generosity of Waterbrook.  (Yes, that is a shameless plug.  It’s my blog, I can.)

So, I hopped over to the random integer people again…  and who did they choose this time????

Yep… number three.  Again, I didn’t pick the right number.  (I thought I’d hedge my bets with sticking to number one.  I’m no gambler apparently.)

Off I went to see who number three is…  I’m just going to tell you btw.  I got tired of copying and pasting.  Sue me.

No don’t.  I just had to shell out 3k for my permanent dentures.  I’m broke.

Number 3 is Bethany.  I suspect I know which one.  I’m off to see…

Yippee!  It is so!  Bethany (you son of a Germanic arch angel you), you won!  I’ll zip it your way asap.

There you have the winners folks.  I do send every book I promise to… I may take a week or three, but I always send em.  You too could win one of these marvelous free books from… (say it with me) WATER BROOK if you just comment on Paradoxology Book Reviews!

How’s that for my commercial?  I liked the “wait, there’s more” myself.  Gave it an air of authenticity, don’tcha think?

The Swiss Courier by Tricia Goyer and Mike Yorkey

I love books that provide suspense and intrigue.  And oh did The Swiss Courier provide!  I have long been fascinated by the WW II, it was my grandparents era and I would love to listen to the stories of their lives at that time so I knew I would enjoy the setting of the book.  I love the Historical continue to be so popular with the Christian crowd  Also this book is set in another country and that always makes me happy!

I found myself liking Gabi, the main character, immediately.  The book draws you in quickly and soon you are a part of the adventure.  I also really enjoyed the writing style of Goyer and Yorkey.  I very much appreciated how thoroughly researched The Swiss Courier was.  I enjoyed the characters and the setting immensely.  I found that the concept of the book was unusual and I thought that made the book all the better.  The underlying lessons of trust and hope bring the whole story together.

There is just not much I can say because I do not want to give anything away!

The Swiss Courier is truly an exceptional historical read.  If you are in the mood for a thrilling and suspenseful ride then give The Swiss Courier a try

About the book:

It is August 1944 and the Gestapo is mercilessly rounding up suspected enemies of the Third Reich. When Joseph Engel, a German physicist working on the atomic bomb, finds that he is actually a Jew, adopted by Christian parents, he must flee for his life to neutral Switzerland. Gabi Mueller is a youngSwiss-American woman working for the newly formed American Office of Strategic Services (the forerunner to the CIA) close to Nazi Germany. When she is asked to risk her life to safely “courier” Engel out of Germany, the fate of the world rests in her hands. If she can lead him to safety, she can keep the Germans from developing nuclear capabilities. But in a time of traitors and uncertainty, whom can she trust along the way? This fast-paced, suspenseful novel takes readers along treacherous twists and turns during a fascinating–and deadly–time in history.

About the Authors:

Tricia Goyer is the author of several books, including Night Song and Dawn of a Thousand Nights, both past winners of the ACFW’s Book of the Year Award for Long Historical Romance. Goyer lives with her family in Montana. To find out more visit her website: www.triciagoyer.com
Mike Yorkey is the author or coauthor of dozens of books, including the bestselling Every Man’s Battle series. Married to a Swiss native, Yorkey lived in Switzerland for 18 months. He and his family currently reside in California.To find out more visit his website: www.MikeYorkey.com

BUY the BOOK!

Check out the rest of the tour!

Thank you, LitFuse, for providing a copy of The Swiss Courier for me to review.

Book Review: A Dark Love by Margaret Carroll

A Dark Love by Margaret Carroll is a romantic suspense.

Caroline Hughes is a young Georgetown wife, married to Dr. Porter Moross, a world-renowned psychoanalyst. One afternoon, Caroline takes her small white Yorkshire terrier, and leaves. She boards a Greyhound bus and leaves for parts unknown, ending up in a small Colorado town. In two short weeks, she begins to fit right in with the sweet small town, even falling a little bit in love with a former Kansas City Chiefs NFL player. Yet all is not well. Her psychotically controlling, abusive husband hunts her down. He attempts to kill both Caroline and her paramour, and ends up killing himself. Caroline and the football player end up together.

That’s the basic outline. The book does provide suspense. It is a pretty standard woman-in-jeopardy storyline, but it is told in a pacey way, with enough complexity to make the outcome both obvious (the woman will win) while withholding enough information so you’re not sure how it resolve. I did not once skim or skip ahead. I really did absorb every word.

There were some problems, however. The first is, the crazy abusive husband had these weird unspecified mommy issues. Like, he called for his mommy without explaining what that was about. Also he had a kind of random way of being a barbarian to his wife. He would beat her with a riding crop while making her recite childhood sexual abuse at her step-father’s hand. I felt like if you’re going to use such serious issues, they deserved a little more depth. But they were mentioned in passing, as if they meant nothing.

On a purely technical level there were several issues. The author mentioned a “Porsche 988.” There is no such car. It would have been easy to Google and find a real car to use. This sort of tiny issue explains why research is so critical.
Carroll also uses the same phrases several times, very close together. Example: on page 179, she writes that autumn was the “harbinger of the season of death.” On page 184, she says the same thing. She also does this with “demons running wild” and several other phrases. It was obvious enough that it kept snagging me out of the fictional dream. Also, there were a few capitalization errors, and comma errors. These were minor, however, compared to the fact that not just one, but two storylines were simply abandoned unresolved. And lastly, Dr. Moross was always referred to as a “psychoanalyst” – the term “psychiatry” or “psychiatrist” never appeared in the book, a fact I found strange.

The last comment was a personal taste issue. The “romance” between Caroline and her paramour, Ken Kincaid, involves exactly two modest kisses and a lot of blushing. I found that sort of avoidance of any kind of serious romance a little disappointing. I didn’t expect wild sex or anything – but I find it difficult to believe Caroline would have endured horrific abuse, moved across the country, then allowed herself to believe she was in love after eight days. I wanted a little more romance and little less crazy husband.

Altogether, despite the problems, I found it a quick, enjoyable, suspenseful read. Perfect for a plane trip or a rainy weekend.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Where's Jamela?

1.     Author: Niki Daly
2.     Date of Publication: 2004
3.     Title: Where’s Jamela?

4.     ISBN: 0374388343
5.     Grade Level: Read Aloud 1-3
6.     What it is about: Jamela’s mother just got a new job and now has to move.  Jamela does not want to move because she likes her house.  Everything is packed up are ready to go and everyone is there, everyone except Jamela.  Where is Jamela?

Chicken Chasing

1.     Author: Janice Harrington Illustrator: Shelley Jackson
2.     Date of Publication: 2007
3.     Title: The Chasing Queen of Lamar County

4.     ISBN: 0374312516
5.     Grade Level: Read Aloud 1-3
6.     What it is about: The Chicken Chasing Queen of Lamar County spends her days chasing Big Mama’s chickens.  She can catch all of the chickens, all but one, Miss Hen.  Miss Hen is different from all the other chickens.  This book has amazing illustrations that will keep you as entertained the story itself.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

NEVERWHERE by Neil Gaiman

Where does the line between reality and fantasy lie? The answer is firmly in the hands of a master dark fantasy writer like Neil Gaiman. Neverwhere follows protagonist Richard Mayhew three years after making one of the biggest decisions of his life as he moves from a small town to the great city of London. He’s managed to land a decent job with a securities firm, somehow convinced an ambitious young lady that his shaggy head was worth waking up to in the morning and then a door opened up, dumping a bleeding Underworld heiress on the sidewalk.

The whole world turns upside down from that moment on in the novel as Richard follows this very special girl through London Below, a place where people speak to rats and baronies have been formed by the people who slip between the cracks. Gaiman is the type of master world-builder that has been rare since the days of Tolkien. The reader can’t help but get carried away on this wild ride; smelling the aromas, seeing the grime and the beauty and most importantly coming to like beyond a doubt all of the characters for their quirks and eccentricities. Even the most fleeting roles in this grand play catch your eye and a piece of your heart. The cruel and amusing duo of Mr. Croup and Mr. Vandemar, assassins for hire who are disappointed by how little blood they are allowed to shed. The Marquis de Carabas, a thief, a cheat and a trixter, whose allegiance is questionable though his charm in undeniable. Hunter, an amazon of the beautiful persuasion with a quiet strength and a feline agility. Then there is Door, a girl who has lost her entire family to murder and betrayal who brings Richard to London Below in her search for answers.

It’s hard not to get completely swept up in the mystery and intrigue of this tale. I’ve never been to London myself, never had a real interest to, except after reading Neverwhere there is a part of me that is curious to visit and find out if there are birdmen on the rooftops, sewer people in the sewers, an earl of Earl’s Court or shepherds at Shepherd’s Bush. It seems like a dangerous place. The words draw you and I doubt anyone can deny that a small portion of your rational mind is pushed aside in the hopes that Gaiman’s London Below exists somewhere along the tube stations. He weaves so much of the real London in with his creation that you come to realize you’re actually learning about the place. I don’t know about other readers – I enjoy a little education with my fun and if a writer can teach me something new I respect him/her all the more.

What it all comes down to at the end of Neverwhere is an experience to be remembered and revisited every once and a while to remind you that there is magic left in the world.

If You're A Single Female, Read This Book

Crash Course in Love By Steve Ward and JoAnn Ward Published November 3, 2009 (the cutest little Hardcover) Pocket Books

Matchmaker, matchmaker, make me a match, find me a find, catch me a catch. Some of my favorite lyrics — from Fiddler on the Roof — and, I might add, a sentiment of my fantasies, as well.  eHarmony keeps saying they have no matches for me, and I have stories, boy do I have stories, about match, chemistry and a few others.  But in Crash Course in Love, we hear from real matchmakers, Steve Ward and his mom JoAnn Ward. I would love to give them a shot at matchmaking me.

They wrote in their book how often they had to convince people to go out with each other — and then the couples would end up married.  They say flesh and blood matchmakers have one huge piece that online dating can’t even touch – intuition!

The book reminds me of Dear Ann which I read when I was growing up — sweet and innocent.  Well, except for the sex talk and the texting talk.  Mama — and Dear Ann — were right, they say, “men don’t buy the cow when the milk is free.”  However, they note that you should expand that comment beyond sex.  A guy always wants mystery to uncover.

It’s a fun book to read, and it slips easily into most pocketbooks or hobo bags.  And, it’s scientific.  Sort of.  the Wards talk about the Law of Natural Selection.  Basically, girls, you want to be a bit different to stand out.  Different in a good way.  Quirky, not so much.  And, put away the bloody phone — he will think you are broadcasting how unimportant he is if you’re taking calls and texting during the date.

Flirting is good.  Nudity is not. The book is common sense, smart, and all the good stuff you need to know — single grrls — is in here.

After reading the book, I think I learned that I haven’t attracted the right guy into my dating sphere, because they think I’m too busy.  Not for the right relationships, I’m not!  I clear the decks for the people I care about. And in meeting new people, too.

One of the most reassuring concepts the Wards put out — there are plenty of great people out there.  You just have to open your eyes.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Crocodile on the Sandbank (with spoiler)

Peters, Elizabeth. Crocodile on the Sandbank. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1975.

Right away I knew Crocodile on the Sandbank was going to be funny. In the opening scene, Amelia Peabody, the novel’s main character, fakes needing an interpreter in Italy so that she has someone to carry her parcels and run her errands. She is a tough-minded, strong-willed, and independent woman on the verge of 20th century modernism. Of considerable wealth and edging towards spinsterhood, Amelia decides she wants to travel to Egypt. It being the late 1800s, she needs a female traveling companion. Enter Eveyln. Evelyn Barton-Forbes is a beautiful young girl with a not-so-innocent past. Amelia takes to her immediately and the two set out for an adventure of a lifetime. What starts out as a harmless journey to Egypt turns into a mystery complete with a murderous mummy and stop-at-nothing suitors. This is the first book in the Amelia Peabody series. Other series by the same author are: Vicky Bliss, art history professor and Jacqueline Kirby, librarian.

Favorite line: “…scarcely a day went by when I was not patching up some scrape or cut, although, to my regret, I was not called upon to amputate anything” (p 78). This is after she packs instruments to help with amputations!

My only source of irritation was when Amelia meets Radcliffe for the first time. Their hatred towards one another is so exaggerated and so comical I knew they would end up getting married. It’s the kind of scene you would see in a movie and predict the end…

Note: Elizabeth Peters is a pseudonym for Barbara Merz and Barbara Michaels. If you ever get the chance, check out her website. It’s fun!

BookLust Twist: In both Book Lust and More Book Lust. In Book Lust in the chapter called, “I Love a Mystery” (p 119), and in More Book Lust in the chapter called, “Crime is a Globetrotter: Egypt” (p 61).

Book Review: A History of Pagan Europe

by Prudence Jones and Nigel Pennick

A History of Pagan Europe is an excellent book which traces the histories of Pagan religions in Europe starting Greeks and Etruscans in the Before Common Era (BCE) years up through its reaffirmation in more modern times. It breaks down into the major cultural groups of Europe and describes a history of each group’s religion (how it came to prominence, its effects on its peoples, and how it was altered over time) and then also gives a brief description or overview of the details of the religion. All of these are backed up with well researched facts and quotes from other prominent researchers as well as historic authors of the time periods in question. It also covers the rise of Christianity and its subsequent effects on the Pagan practices of Europe. It goes up through the Reformation period, discussing the resurgence and reaffirmation of Paganism, and touches briefly on the presence of Paganism in the modern day.

This book is a fantastic compiling of information. Though at many times rather dense and chock full of complex quotes and facts, it is a wonderful overview of the histories and beliefs of the peoples it covers. Great care was clearly taken in the writing of this book to ensure its accuracy, but also its objectivity so that it could considered an academic book as opposed to just another Pagan writing on his/her interpretations of Pagan history. Even in discussing the attempts by the Christians to stamp out Paganism, an even, objective tone was kept showing favoritism to either side, simply fact. I was glad of this use of the tone as it gives the book credibility and makes it a firmer piece of literature.

I found this book to be completely fascinating. Though the slim tome cannot possibly cover all of the history in the vast span of years it covers, it was full of amazing details and small facts that I had not known before that truly helped to give me a fuller understanding of Our Druidry and the ADF ritual format. One part that stands out particularly in my mind was the discussion on how Ancient Grecians always gave sacrifice or libation to the Earth prior to doing so for any other deity, showing the precident for our own invocations to the Earth Mother at the beginning of each ritual. Also the emphasis of tree reverence and worship that was practically universal across Europe was made so much more clear to me. Prior to this, though I appreciated our reverence for trees, this made the entrenchment of tree reverence in ADF more understandable for me. I was also extremely intrigued by the play between Paganism and Christianity in Ancient Rome and the play between the two; Pagans claim to have been persecuted for years by the Christian Church, however, Christians were also persecuted for quite sometime by Pagan kingdoms across Europe as well. I was not aware of how prominent Paganism remained either. School textbooks make it seem like Christianity came and all other religions disappeared, when in fact there were long wars and many, many instances where Paganism was reinstated as official religions for decades before being pushed out again. This book also helped me to appreciate the fact that the religion never truly disappeared, it was simply pushed underground and re-adapted in to something else. As I have already mentioned, this book has strengthened my understanding of the history and background of Paganism immensely and I am extremely glad to have read it. I would gladly recommend, and have already recommended, the reading of this book to friends and colleagues, regardless of their religious affiliations.
(Word Count – 606)

Friday, October 16, 2009

Harvey Cox's "The Future of Faith"

I just received for review The Future of Faith by Harvard’s professor of divinity emeritus, Harvey Cox.  I’m going to go ahead and say it’s a must read for anyone interested in a faithfully critical look at the construction of doctrines within Christian history, as well as the different sects that emerged with those doctrines.  Brilliant research, accessible readability, Cox’s personal history with varying traditions, and allegories of discussions with everyone from Jerry Falwell to the Pope Benedict make this an incredibly inclusive and in-depth look at the history of the Church.

Cox’s central thesis is that the church is edging into a “Age of the Spirit,” as he puts it, a move beyond the “Age of Belief” that dominated the church from the 4th century at Nicaea until the mid 20th century.  This age of Spirit will see the multifaceted and never consistent belief structure of the pre-Constantinian church, a less emphasis on lists of beliefs as requirement for inclusion, and higher emphasis on praxis.  The age of beliefs killed the spirit, and with it we learned to kill each other for the purpose of consistency under the name of piety.  The Catholics coined the elegant Latin killjoy, Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, to mean there was no salvation outside the (Catholic) Church.  As of late, American Fundamentalism has sought to do the same with sets of beliefs chosen in response to the religious debates of the 1920’s.  As Cox sees it, we are moving beyond this.  While it will never disappear, Fundamentalism is on the decline, and the shift resulting from globalization requires a new emphasis on, not just inter-faith dialogue,  but intrafaith faith dialogue as well with the margins resisting change of any kind from a firmly 19th/20th century faith.

In his chapter entitled “The Road Runner and the Gospel of Thomas,” Cox points to salient histories that just ain’t so.  Like the coyote running of a cliff while chasing the roadrunner while continuing to suspend in air, our pervasive myths of history support us well- at least until we learn that we have no historical ground beneath this.  For Catholics, this may come in the form of scholarship highlighting the lack of veracity in claims of Apostolic Succession.  In a system where claim to power comes from being heir to Peter, one needs to continue to believe in a myth that things simply were this way from the beginning.  Protestants do this same thing, believing 1) that there was a set of original beliefs based purely on the Bible (even though the Bible would not be constructed until the late 4th century) and 2) they, or their church, conforms to this list of proper orthodox beliefs.  In fact, these two beliefs are always illusory.  These misunderstandings stem from, Cox argues, a myth of orthodoxy.  Scholarship is simply pummeling these myths.  As Cox puts it, research shows “scattered throughout the Roman Empire from Antioch to Gaul, there was no standardized theology, no single pattern of governance, no uniform liturgy, and no commonly accepted scripture… Some, especially around Jerusalem, emphasized the historical Jesus; others, the universal Christ; and still others, a mystical inner Christ.”

With the advent of Emperor Constantine pushing for a uniform Christianity to stabilize the fledgling Roman Empire, power was handed to certain clergymen who were by no means disinterested or objective observers. When time came to settle on holy books, beliefs, or authority structures, preferences were read back into the texts and histories selected, which created a myth of orthodoxy.  It’s much the same as the way we remember what we want to remember in order to justify ourselves in a fight, or how we chose to ignore unsettling factoids about past men we want to venerate.  A movement that had begun with a messiah, crucified because of the political danger he posed, now hopped into bed with “the Man.”  Ever since, Christians have felt entitled to political nobility, seeking to create laws that either benefit them or enforce their ideals.  The irony of the first ecumenical council at Nicaea in 325 A.D. being called by a pagan emperor and deciding that, yes, Jesus and God must be one in the same, is an irony lost on most Christians today.  Yes, we believe this about Jesus being co-eternal with the Father, but would we believe this if not for a group of power-hungry bishops being lobbied for this position by a sun-worshipping emperor, all while surrounding the council of bishops stood soldiers with swords drawn awaiting for their consent to a particular belief?  It’s really quite impossible to tell.

Cox argues that 3 developments have undermined the myth of orthodoxy:

1) The 1940’s finding of the ancient texts hidden and preserved in caves provided us with gospels and biblical texts unseen for the better part of two millennia.  Though most likely written under a pseudonym (likely as several books of the New Testament were), the Gospel of Thomas and others presented us with texts every bit as old as several of the Canonical Gospels.  We saw in these ancient manuscripts such evidence that the early Christian community already varied far and wide in belief and practice.  This combined with finding older texts of books we include in the Bible already, texts with sometimes differed very significantly with our versions today (much as your average apologist insists the opposite), shook of the educated world from the myth of a perfectly preserved Biblical text, dictated word-for-word from God, from whence our current beliefs come from.

2)  Until very recently, historians and New Testament scholars did not talk.  One held the realm of scholarship, the other the realm of religion.  After all, Cox comments, NT scholars were supposed to work with inerrant texts, while historians new, with evidence in hand, that this was not the case.  Historians new as well, to the chagrin of Catholic scholars, that apostolic authority was a contrived myth, and nor were early Christian theologians neutral or critical as historians.  But when historians and Biblical scholars hop into bed, a love child of a more educated and informed faith emerges, although this education has been slow to disseminate to the masses.  Even pastors, who become very well aware of the problems with Biblical texts in seminaries, rarely pass on this information to their congregations.

3)  The third development is a “people’s history” of Christianity.  Sans Gutenberg’s cheap publishing, today’s blogs, or even literacy, most of our pictures of early Christianity come from far less than 1%- the most political and the most educated.  Like today’s heady theologians, such men do good work, but do not represent the common people’s Christianity.  Recent work has rediscovered this, painting a broader picture of the amorphous early Church, and further killing the myth of one orthodoxy.

At last, Cox slides in the problem of reading the Gospel through our culture.  As a culture that emphasizes separation of church and state, or coming from a stream of theology that emphasizes “getting saved,” it is all to easy to miss the earthy message of Christ, and the political reasons he was killed for.  We miss the anti-empire rhetoric of Jesus, John’s Revelation, and the early church.  We miss that early Christians were persecuted not for telling people they were going to hell if they didn’t believe in Jesus, but because they refused to pledge allegiance to Rome, because they (in a rare example of early unanimity) refused to participate in politics or the military, because they refused to look like patriots.  In a cultural theology that encourages all these things, it’s really quite easy to miss messages.

More on Cox’s work to come… conversations with the Pope, pagans writing our Creeds, the rise of American 20th century Fundamentalism, and the future of faith.

In the Mail

Jesse Hillman at Zondervan sent along copies of the following:

  • The Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible: Revised, Full-Color Edition (5 vols.) — Merrill C. Tenney & Moisés Silva, eds.
  • Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary: Old Testament (5 vols.) — John H. Walton, ed.

After flipping through a couple of the volumes I can already tell that these are going to be tremendously useful reference books.  I was reading the list of contributors in the the ZEB and I can’t think of an evangelical scholar who hasn’t contributed to this thing.  Both sets are beautifully bound but if I have to register one immediate complaint it will be an aesthetic one: the separate volumes in the ZEB all have have different colored covers.  It looks funny on my shelf.  But both sets came in really nice slipcases that are very thick and durable.  I’ve removed them from the slipcases for now but if they ever occupy space other than in my bookcase I’ll be sure to use them.  In any event, look for a series of reviews in the weeks/months to come.

B”H

Monday, October 12, 2009

Book Review: The Nature of Necessity

Alright, I managed to finish another book this weekend. This is one I’ve been working through for months. Literally.

The Nature of Necessity by Alvin Plantinga is quite the philosophy book. In it, Plantinga tackles “The distinction between necessary and contingent truth (1)…” He distinguishes necessity de re and de dicto necessity. De dicto necessity he defines as “a matter of a proposition’s being necessarily true (v)” while de re necessity is “an object’s having a property essentially or necessarily.”

The first few chapters compose Plantinga’s argument for de re necessity by showing that such things can be shown in de dicto terms. It is quite an interesting section, and one in which I think Plantinga makes a strong case. Chapter IV I found particularly interesting, as Plantinga’s discussion here starts to turn to modal logic. The discussion of how we should define worlds, books (which I take to mean a list of propositions that belong to a given world), actuality, possibility, and the like. This discussion is extremely interesting and leads to some conclusions like “A possible world… is a possible state of affairs in the broadly logical sense… a state of affairs S is complete or maximal if for every state of affairs S’, S includes S’ or S precludes S’. And a possible world is simply a possible state of affairs that is maximal (45).”

But then, “Equally obviously [as that one state of affairs obtains], at most one obtains; for suppose two worlds W and W* are distinct worlds, there will be some state of affairs S such that W includes S and W* precludes S. But then if both W and W* are actual, S both obtains and does not obtain; and this, as they say, is repugnant to the intellect (45).”

These kinds of conclusions are to be found throughout The Nature of Necessity and it is this that makes the book such a good read. Plantinga’s descriptions of various states of affairs never fails to entertain, as his sense of humor is present at places throughout the book, while he still maintains his extremely rigorous treatment of the items at hand.

In later chapters (notably VI), Plantinga defends his version of necessity from alternatives, and in the process raises some objections to these alternatives. I’d write more of these out, but the fact of the matter is that the Nature of Necessity has that problem that I believe most books that are so heavy on analytic philosophy have: if one doesn’t read the whole, it is hard to understand any one part. This isn’t really a strike against the book, but is rather simply of note. The way that Plantinga builds on each previous point throughout the book helps give his case clarity.

Once Plantinga has gotten the bulk of the text out of the way, having made a strong case for necessity, he gets into how it is that these concepts apply to God, particularly the theistic God. The chapters about God and evil and God and necessity are largely recycled (or perhaps reworked) versions of his book God, Freedom, and Evil. As such, I didn’t spend a lot of time on these chapters, but in them Plantinga presents his case for the “Victorious Modal” version of the Ontological Argument. It is a version that I think has great potential, and has been the subject of some debate (see Graham Oppy, for instance… or the Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology’s treatment). Plantinga’s defense of theism from the problem of evil is equally impressive. I have written about it in the past, so I will not do so again, but I do think that Plantinga’s various arguments carry some weight and certainly merit discussion among apologists.

The Nature of Necessity closes with an appendix of some length (30 pages) about modal logic. Specifically, it is directed at answering objections (and more specifically, Quine’s objections) to modal logic. I believe that Plantinga does a fine job of taking on this task, and making a valid case for modal logic, but readers must be absolutely warned that a deep understanding of symbolic logic is required to even begin to approach the appendix. I recommend tackling some texts on logic before reading the appendix. As it was, I had to write out a list of the symbols being used in order to understand this section. It took me several days to get through the appendix alone. But once one does so, they will find that it is yet another rewarding section in an overall wonderful book.

The book weighs in at about 251 pages (including the appendix, but not including the preface), but the content that it includes is immense. Not only that, but the text itself is so heavy that a single page can often take minutes to work through and ponder. I recommend The Nature of Necessity to those who wish to explore, well, necessity and what it means further. It is by no means an easy work to read, and will require quite a bit of pondering and rereading, but in the end the payoff is worth it.

Scores (5 is truly average):

Quality of Arguments (if it applies): 10

Overall Content: 8

Difficulty: 9

Clarity: 9

Theology/Doctrine: N/A- other than theism, this doesn’t really have enough to judge the work based on Doctrinal or Theological stances

Value (price): 8- There’s a lot here, and I think it warrants the purchase price.

Relevance: 6- I don’t know how much use I’ll get out of the book as an apologetic work. Plantinga’s God, Freedom, and Evil may be more useful in this regard, but that doesn’t really take away from how much I liked the book

Review Criteria:

The Quality of arguments is just what it says. Obviously this is subjective. Do I think the arguments presented in the book (if there are any) are valid and/or useful?

Overall Content is a general judge of how good I felt the book is.

Difficulty is the amount of work it takes to get through the work. Higher values don’t necessarily mean the book is better, just more difficult to read.

Clarity simply outlines how clear I believe the author was.

Theology/Doctrine is my judgment, clearly based on my presuppositions, of how good I felt the author’s theological or doctrinal content was (if there is any).

Value is a determination of whether I believe the book is worth the asking price.

Relevance outlines whether I think the book has real-life applications. A low score in this doesn’t necessarily mean the book is bad, just that I believe there may not be much to use. In other words, a book could score low on this criterium, but I might still find it quite good.

Kristin Cashore's <i>Graceling</i>

**spoiler alert**
I was sucked in immediately. I always appreciate a strong female character, and Graceling didn’t disappoint on that front. I loved the relationships between her and the other characters. All characters and relationships were different, and all were delightful in their own way.

All the same, it bugged me that she never settled into herself. Like many good protagonists do, she goes on a journey about self-discovery that is beautiful, and complex, and totally fun to follow. Then at the end, when she’s mostly figured herself out, instead of making the sacrifices necessary to be with the one she loves, in order to grow together with him, she decides that she’s going to continue her journey alone and basically kicks his butt back to his house.

To be fair, she announces her intentions to never tie herself to anyone, all through the book. I thought that once she didn’t need to focus on herself so much that she might be able to give to someone else. I guess I was just hoping for a less selfish ending to an otherwise delightful book.

mental inoculation

I picked up a copy of George Orwell’s The Road to Wigan Pier at a used bookstore the other day.  While 1984 and Animal Farm may be more widely known for their commentary on the future intrusiveness of government and the human condition, Wigan Pier is Orwell’s eye-witness account of the squalid conditions of Northern England in the 1930s and a critical view of socialism in England at the time.  While I am still reading it and cannot comment fully, a passage  from early in the book got me to thinking about a brief exchange on post I wrote about war photos being released for public consumption.  In this excerpt, Orwell is speaking about a poor, filthy couple, the Brookers, who ran a bit of a boarding house:

But it is of no use saying that people like the Brookers are just disgusting and trying to put them out of mind.  For they exist in tens and hundreds of thousands; they are one of the characteristic by-products of the modern world.  You cannot disregard them if you accept the civilisation that produced them.  For this is part at least of what industrialism has done for us.  …[A]nd this is where it all led – to labyrinthine slums and dark black kitchens with sickly, ageing people creeping round and round them like blackbeetles. 

It is a kind of duty to see and smell such places now and again, especially smell them, lest you forget that they exist; though perhaps it is better not to stay there too long.

In the war photo post, I asked if graphic but truthful photos of American soldiers injured/dying/dead on the battlefield should be shown to the American public.  AnnaK said she wasn’t going to go out of her way to find them, but that yes, they should be shown, but in measured doses so to keep us aware of what is going on in the world.  Orwell seems to think along the same lines as well.  And if the goal is to keep such things as the reality of war or poverty merely on the radar of the general public, then I too agree that such things could be taken in small doses.

But I have to wonder if the point of exposing the American population to various harsh realities is merely to get them to remember.  Or is the hope to get them to respond, to act is some way to such harsh realities?  Is it to get them to feel once again?

I fear that small doses of reality over time, such as the picture of a disfigured, dying soldier or the account of living conditions in 1930s England, only serve to inoculate the population from taking any action.  Consider the vaccines we all have received over the years.  When was the last time you worried about Measles or Mumps, or Rubella?  We don’t because we were inoculated.  We were inoculated so we could go about our business without worrying about a nasty disease.  The same is true for being made aware of the tragedies that go on around the world.

 A case in point: even though the ban put in place back in 1991 was lifted finally, we do not see photos of flag-draped coffins coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan.  I recommend reading this piece by Byron York at The Washington Examiner.  And this one from The Edmonton Sun’s Andrew Hanon.

- mike

Friday, October 9, 2009

Teen Advisory Group

The WOPL Teen Advisory Group (TAG) met Wednesday, October 7th.  8 Volunteers attended and we discussed our plans for the year as well as killing innocent people in video games.  Both were very important conversations. 

Most everyone signed up to review a book or dvd to be posted in the teen book section and on this blog!  If you’re interested in reviewing something, leave a comment on this blog post and bring it to the next TAG meeting on Wednesday, November 4th @ 7:30pm.

Book Review - Cirque Du Freak: Tunnels of Blood

Cirque Du Freak: Tunnels of Blood
BY: Darren Shan
PUBLISHED BY: Little, Brown and Company
PUBLISHED IN: 2000
ISBN: 0-316-60763-0
Pages: 229
Ages: Teen & Up
Reviewed by Billy Burgess

In this fast-paced sequel, Mr. Crepsley is on business in the city and takes Darren and Evra with him. Christmas is just around the corner and Darren is the only one who wants to celebrate. He goes shopping for a present for Evra and bumps into a teenager, Debbie. He soon begins dating her.

Meanwhile, there are strange deaths in the city. Is Mr. Crepsley? Or is there another vampire hiding in the tunnels of blood.

I read this in one night. It’s a lot better than the second book. It’s exciting from the very beginning to the heartbreaking ending.

Book Review - Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant

Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant
BY: Darren Shan
PUBLISHED BY: Little, Brown and Company
PUBLISHED IN: 2000
ISBN: 0-316-60684-7
Pages: 247
Ages: Teen & Up
Reviewed by Billy Burgess

In this sequel, Darren is adjusting to his new life as Mr. Crepsley’s assistant. They return to the Cirque Du Freak. Darren becomes good friends with Evra, the snake boy.

While traveling with the freak show Darren meets another friend, Sam. Sam wants to leave home and join the Cirque Du Freak. Darren, now a half-vampire, must learn the hard way that he can never have a normal life.
I thought this the 2nd book in the series was boring and a major letdown.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

House on the Strand

du Maurier, Daphne. The House on the Strand. New York: Doubleday Company, 1969.

I chose this book for October because somewhere out there someone deemed October National Starman month…whatever that means. When I think of Starmen, I think of David Bowie and Starman and Moonage Daydream. Don’t ask me why. I just do. That leads me to think of Natalie singing his version of  “keep your mouth shut, you’re squawking like a pink monkey bird” and that’s when things get really weird. And weird to me, is and will always be, October. Halloween and all that.

BookLust Twist: From More Book Lust in the chapter called, “Time Travel” (p 221).

And the Winner Is...

If you entered my Holy Bible: Mosaic giveaway contest you had a fantastic opportunity to win a copy of Mosaic and odds that you’ll never get in Vegas or in the lottery!

So…fanfare aside, the winner of my giveaway is @martyrologist! Thanks for your thoughtful comment and mention/link on Twitter.  To the others who entered, I wish I had copies to give to everyone, but there are still many contests in work and other opportunities to win.  Check Mosaic’s blog for tour dates and locations!

Monday, October 5, 2009

Harold James on the Globalization Cycle

Harold James, The Creation and Destruction of Value: The Globalization Cycle. Harvard University Press, 2009.

Princeton Professor Harold James is the author of one of my favorite globalization books, The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression (2001), so I was excited to learn about his new book on the economic crisis. James is unique in his deep understanding of how financial crisis pushed globalization over the edge in the 1930s and how the current crisis compares with that devastating experience.

I know of only one person who might be James’s equal in this regard: his name is Ben and he works for the Federal Reserve. Since Bernanke isn’t free to write books about the crisis just yet, James is my go-to-guy for deep insights.

And I am not disappointed.  Each chapter provides key ideas and raises questions that will draw me back to re-read this book. James’s comparison between the Crash of 2008 and the crises of 1929 and 1931, for example, helped me understand both the recent past and the Great Depression much more clearly. His chapter on the chronology of the crisis is well crafted and broadly useful. I guess I am especially drawn to the last two chapters, however, which look at power and values.

Major financial crises really shake things up. In the penultimate chapter James considers how power will shift in the international system. Will the US retain its strong position or will China or the EU rise to fill the void. James’s wise analysis reminds me of Paul Kennedy’s writings of 20 years ago — informed and useful, raising many questions.

The final chapter on values is very thought-provoking. The collapse of values leaves people confused about whom and what to trust. This is true about market values, which is what the chapters mainly discusses, but also about values more generally, which is how James concludes the book.

Regaining trust is a long and arduous process. That is why when globalization is broken, it is not easy to put it back together again. We will look for communities of virtue, but inevitably we will not find them at once. And the globalization cycle will resume, but not immediately (page 277).

James is right about this, as I argue in Globaloney 2.0. Globalization will come back, but not in the same form. Market values will come back first (see the stock market’s recent surge) but faith in broader values will not be so easily restored.

Netbook Review

You may or may not accept heard of the appellation “Netbooks”. They assume to be all the acerbity in claimed accretion these days. So what are they? Netbooks are the new chic of adaptable computers that action an another to laptops. Basically, they are a abate adaptation of the laptop, both in anatomy agency and accretion adeptness to assassinate adeptness, Computer, accelerated accretion applications. They may actual able-bodied be the next anarchy in adaptable computing. Computer manufacturers, Computer, are now alms a scaled down adaptation of the all-over laptop. The another they are alms is one that is smaller, thinner and inexpensive. Bargain as compared to the amount of a approved laptop and in some cases even beneath big-ticket than a adaptable phone. So is this scaled down adaptation of a accretion belvedere for you? Are you accommodating to accord up your laptop for a netbook?Before you adjudge on purchasing a netbook, it would be acceptable abstraction to analyze and accept your requirements for a adaptable accretion platform. What do you do with that accepted laptop of yours? Chances are that you use it added generally to cream the web, run appointment applications for certificate processing, spreadsheets, presentations, email, etc. If, Computer, you are a adeptness web user, you apparently could do all of this on the web. Is there any bounded appliance on your laptop that could advance the absolute accretion assets of your laptop? This apparently is a aberration for a lot of laptop users. Games, photo, video, music alteration applications, etc., could be allotment of the mix but even some of these accept online alternatives.Most netbooks run windows software. The operating arrangement, Computer, that comes installed is mostly Windows XP. So there is annihilation new on the OS foreground that users would crave to learn. Specifications in accepted cover the Intel Atom N alternation dent with a alarm acceleration appraisement of 1.6 GHz and installed RAM at 1 GB with the adeptness to aggrandize to 2 GB. A awning admeasurement of 10.1″ TFT may be a attached agency for some users, but accustomed the accuracy, Computer, of screens today and, Computer, the primary action getting a abate anatomy factor, this, Computer, could be calmly overlooked.Netbooks are accessible from, Computer, a lot of above computer manufacturers a lot of conspicuously from Acer and Asustek. Both Acer and Asustek accept a advanced artefact array and adorable amount points, abnormally acceptable for acceptance and business users, Computer, . Netbooks could serve as the accepted accretion belvedere for acceptance in schools, colleges and universities, Computer, . Small and average business owners and accumulated admiral who are out and about, could aswell account from netbooks. Sales force cadre who are consistently on the move visiting, Computer, customers, could use netbooks to affix with aback appointment applications over the web from a chump location.Today, added, Computer, plan is getting done on bringing netbooks able of alive with altered operating systems (e.g., Computer, Linux), dent sets etc., to accomplish low amount accretion achievable for all user groups. Looking advanced into the future, you, Computer, can apprehend to see faster, thinner and beneath big-ticket accretion platforms. Click on Netbook Review to see a account of the latest netbooks available. Compare, Computer, appearance and specs to acquisition one that would clothing your needs the most.

Featured Book: Find Your Strongest Life

Find Your Strongest Life By Markus Buckingham What the Happiest and Most Sucessful Women Do Differently Book Description

In Find Your Strongest Life, Marcus Buckingham reveals the powerful key to bring fulfillment, peace, and control into a woman’s life.

In today’s world, can a woman truly “have it all”? A fulfilling career full of passion and performance? A belief that she is truly becoming the best, authentic version of herself? A happy, healthy life outside of work?

Countless women would roll their eyes at the possibility. Work is overwhelming. And for many of them, add the necessities of family and home. It all feels disconnected, out of control, and relentless.

In Find Your Strongest Life, Marcus Buckingham reveals the powerful key to help women draw enough strength from life to feel fulfilled, loved, successful, and in control. Even more, he helps women reconnect with their purpose and gives a starting point for change. A research-based message that applies to work and life, Find Your Strongest Life shows women a “unified theory” for how they really can have it all . . . the right kind of all.

Video Trailer Link

My Review:  ♥  ♥

This book was well written and thought out. It does have some valuable information, including the Strongest Life Role Test, that would help a woman find what career she should pursue. But I can’t recommend it because I don’t accept the basic premise of the book. I spent the first six chapters wondering how I got this far in life without realizing how unhappy I am. I thought I was a basically happy person, but according to this book, I’m wrong. According to this book, no woman is happy unless she has a satisfying, fulfilling career. It doesn’t matter what other things she has going for her, if she’s in the wrong career or her career is not what she would like it to be, she’s unhappy. And pity the poor woman who decides to forego her career for the sake of her family. She’s the unhappiest of all. I don’t accept this. Happiness is a state of mind that comes from a right relationship with God. It is a choice, not a career choice.

Friday, October 2, 2009

And now, Napoleon leaves Moscow

 

The “Big Army” crossing the Beresina River; (September 15, 2009)

 

            The self appointed Emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte, had entered Moscow.  The Russian governor of Moscow burned his Capital three days after the French troops entered this “Saint City”.  Bonaparte lingered for an entire month in Moscow, hopelessly waiting for Czar Alexander to initiate negotiation.  Bonaparte finally ordered the retreat; he also ordered General Moreau to blast off the Kremlin. Bonaparte was forced to re-take the same route he used for coming to Moscow.  Bonaparte and “The Big Army” of 670,000, initially, were to re-witness the scene of carnage of the battle of Borodino; with a twist: the 80,000 victims were reduced to carcasses and the wolves and crows had done their cleaning job.

            Finally, after weeks of walking in the Russian winter weather half the army was dead from freezing, famine, drowning, and diseases. The guerilla Cossacks harassed this multinational army into lunacy; many soldiers were acting up crazy and irrationally. Then this big army had to cross the Beresina River.  The Russian General Kutuzoff appeased the British General Wilson saying: “It is in the swamps of Beresina that the meteorite will cool down.  So far, Bonaparte has no alternative but to follow the passage that I let him take; he is not even allowed to stop and rest.”

            The main bridges on the Beresina were destroyed.  The French engineering regiment headed by Eble tried to build all night long two makeshift bridges in a valley; they had to construct the bridges dipping in frozen water. The pontoon layers knew that they will not survive the day.

            The Russian army of 40,000 headed by General Tchitchakoff was waiting on the other side of the river. Miracle of miracle, in the morning the Russians had vacated their posts to allow Bonaparte safe passage and not be made prisoner. Bonaparte crossed at 2 pm. Then mayhem ensued.

            The entire army was pressing to cross on unstable bridges. The first wave of crossers drowned or was trampled due to the heavy push from the back.  Those trying to climb from the sides were carried off by the freezing powerful river. Women were holding their babies off water to be picked up before sinking in the river; not many babies found rescuers: everybody had no time to lose.

            What is it with women and babies following armies? It has been the custom since antiquity for whole families to follow their “noble warriors”, not those mercenaries or poor soldiers. Perhaps the noble warriors didn’t feel excited being deprived of their tasty dishes or the warmth of female bodies. But what is it with babies and kids following an army? I never knew of a noble warrior caring of providing sympathy and affection to their kids. Obviously, women were of great help washing, cooking, cleaning after, gathering woods, tending the wounded, and rejuvenating the illusion of a peaceful period.  In this Russian campaign the civilians following the armies were caught between fires, crushed by horses and carriages, and killed when made prisoners.

            Then the Russian shells aimed amid this dense army increased the havoc. The bridge reserved for the artillery broke down. The masses surging from behind prohibited the column from backtracking. Everyone was precipitated in the river.  Thus, there was a surge to the only remaining bridge; men and materials were to be using this bridge. The carriages could not be stopped and entered in the masses and crashed into the compact assembled soldiers.  Nobody was hearing the moaning of the fallen and trampled.

            Bonaparte sent a brief message to the French Senate “During the 26 and 27 of November the army crossed.”   On December 5, 1812 Bonaparte abandoned his army and fled to Paris.

            If it was a military matter General Kutuzoff could have annihilated the French Big Army but he allowed it to cross the Russian borders.  There are two reasons for that decision: first, it was a highly political decision by Czar Alexander I.  Bonaparte was the master of Europe.  Without Bonaparte Europe would have sank into civil wars; the European leaders preferred Napoleon to stay for a short while so that he be targeted as the sole enemy and thus unite Europe until a political plan for restructuring the States is agreeable to all parties after the fall of Napoleon.  Second, it was a pragmatic decision.  The Russian army barely could afford to feed its soldiers.  It would have turned a horrific burden to caring for over 200,000 enemy soldiers who were enfeebled, sick, and crazy.  General Kutuzoff must have been extremely relieved to see the enemy has finally retreated behind the borders.

Customs in the Middle East

Customs in the Middle East (October 2, 2009)

 

Note 1:  The title refers to the Middle East since the term Near East is not familiar to many readers.  The Near East is the region in the Middle East that comprises Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the coastal shores of Turkey, and the region in Iraq where the Euphrates (Al Furat) River crosses.  It is my contention that the eastern region of the Tiger (Dujlat) River in Iraq was mostly influenced by the Persian culture and civilization. Thus, the geographic limit of the Near East starts from the western side of the Tiger River all the way to the Mediterranean Sea.

Note 2:  This post is a repository of the customs and traditions in this region as mentioned in the Bibles (Jewish, Christian, and Moslem). The customs and traditions of the Land in the Levant were practiced thousands of years before Judaism came to be.  The Jewish religion adopted the customs of the Land of the Levant (or what is known as the Near East) and the scribes wrote in the same style of imagery, maxims, and aphorism. The original manuscripts describe accurately the culture of the Land and in the same style.

Note 3: The Bibles are not famous for historical accuracies; they were not written by the dozens of scribes for that purpose.  The Bibles are excellent sources as repositories of the customs and traditions in the Near East which are still practiced for over six thousand of years.  It has been said that if Abraham and his generation were resurrected they will feel perfectly at home and go about their daily routines and tasks as if they have just waken up from a dream.  Although “modernism” was forced upon the Levant, especially in the urban centers and megalopolis areas, the remote towns and villages have been practically spared and left untouched, even for cooking their weekly load of Levantine bread.  In this article, Near East means the Levant as one Land.

 

A brief Introduction:

            Since time immemorial the Near East was famous for exporting olive oil, grape wine and dried figs.  No wonder that grape vine, olive trees and fig trees are the symbols of prosperity and shade in this region where it does not rain for straight seven months. The coastal regions of the Levant imported all kinds of grains, especially, wheat and lentil. 

The meals are frugal and consisting of thin large loaves of bread (khobz markouk) baked in special underground oven once a week, a few olives, tomatoes, onion, vegetable from the garden, and dried fruits in the off seasons. Wheat was transformed in crushed wheat (borghol) for the kebeh and tabouli; diary components were cooked into many varieties of cheese, yogurt, labneh, and keshk.  Meat was scarce and a single sheep was over fed during summer to be slaughtered in late autumn and the meat cooked and dried (kaworma) and saved for winter for the omelets. A couple of goats or cows lived in the basement or a side room and chicken were raised for eggs and for the occasional guests.  Nothing would go to waste and summer time was a hectic period for all kinds of chores related to storing provisions for winter.

 

On the Written Style

 

The written style in the Levant is characterized by direct pronouncements expressing feeling and describing what is seen and heard.  The sentences are not encumbered by prefixes such as “I think”, “I believe”, “I am not sure”, “It is possible”, “There might be other versions”, “I might be wrong”, or “It is my opinion”, or what the western writers have adopted from the Greek rational style.  The style in the Levant sounds confident, categorical, and conveying the total truth though it does not mean that the people cannot discriminate or feel the variations and uncertainties.  The writers in the Levant simply feel that all these attachments are redundant since it is a fact of life that nothing is categorical or certain; thus, superfluous additions disturb the flow of thoughts and the ideas that need to be conveyed.  Consequently, the author feels that the western readers of the Bible should tone down their uneasiness with “outrageous” direct and assured pronouncements in the Bible.

 

 On the Verbal Style

 

The verbal style tends toward the devotional and far from the business approach. The dialect in the Levant reveals the relationship with the Creator is the first of wisdoms and spirituality is a foundation.  The recurring mention of God the provider at the beginning of any reply or “peace of God be upon you” or telling a worker “God gives you health” or to the harvester “God bless your crop” or asking the shepherd “How are the blessed ones?” or saying “What’s its religion?” to get more information on the nature of a thing are all part of the daily utterances.

When the Levantine tells a story he is extravagant and the facts sound too far fetched simply because he wants to amuse and impress; the listener understands perfectly the intent of the fantasy and they share a good laugh.  The rational westerner gets the impression that the Levantine is not honest because he does not stick to the bare boring facts.  For example, when you wake up someone at seven you tell him “Get up, it is already noon and the daylight is over”; when there is a large gathering we say “The entire town was assembled”.  Jesus said “if your right eye sinned snatched it out; better not your whole body ends up in the eternal fire” or “if someone asks to be clothed give him your robe and underwear too” or “Forgive seventy times seven a day” which drive the holy number seven to an extreme number of holiness; a number that should not be taken to the word but to drive in the message of ready forgiveness.

In the Bibles it is said “After six days” and you wonder starting from which date, which event?  Or it is said “They went up a high mountain” and you want to ask “how high?” and “which mountain?”  If you insist on the height of the mountain he would reply “it was so high it pierced the clouds” The purpose of the story is to entertain and prepare for the punch line.  For example, John the Baptist is not in the mood of cajoling and says to the Pharisees “Sons of vipers, how will you escape the wrath of God? I tell you if God wished he will turn these stones sons of Abraham”

The Levantine is ever ready to swear on his father, his head, his mustaches, and anything that is holy to convey the message of his sincerity.  It is this custom of constant swearing that baffle the westerner and increases his suspicions.  Jesus was aware of this custom and insisted on his disciples never to swear on anything but rather “let your answer be yes, yes or no, no”.  This summoning of Jesus had no effects whatsoever in our Land.

It is important to grasp four characteristics in the Levantine customs: first, every region and every town has its own slang and it is the best proof of your origin. For example, the more Peter denied his knowledge of Jesus the more people were convinced that he was from Galilee. After the battle between the Galaad and the Efrem prisoners were slaughtered because they pronounced “shiboulat” “siboulat”. Second, it is recommended to insist until requests are obtained; for example, Gideon insists on two material miracles from God to believe him; or when Jesus repeats three times “Do you love me Peter?” before he divulges the most important order of “shepherding the flock” of disciples. Third, insinuation is not understood and abhorred and thus, a clear solemn affirmation is demanded. Fourth, the Levantine does not appreciate constraining and transition expressions such as “As I see, or I think that, or it is alleged, or it is possible, and so forth”.  The Levantine verbal expression is of certitude and feeling, compatible to his spiritual and devotional nature.

 

On Business Transactions:

            Abraham had no piece of land in Canaan; his clan let their goats and sheep graze in unclaimed lands. As there was a death in the family Abraham resolved to prepare for his burial; he sent a third party to ask Afroun son of Sohar of the tribe of Hath for a small piece of land to bury the dead. Abraham said: “I am a guest in your land. Could you give me a swath so that I may bury what is in front of me?”  Every village had a burying ground facing east and guests, by the custom of hospitality, could be enjoying the same facilities. Afroun replied: “Abraham you are a reverend and I shall bury the deceased in the best of our graves” Abraham had set his mind to settle in Canaan and wanted his own burial ground, thus he asked to buy a piece of land.  Afroun replied: “A land of no more than 400 silver shekels should not be an obstacle” Abraham got the hint and sent the amount.  This polite and diplomatic negotiation is part of the Levant customs thousand of years before Abraham came to Canaan.

 

On Bread and Salt:

In the Levant, women leaven their dough overnight in clay pottery for the next day baking; the baking lasted a whole day for a week ration. The neighboring families would select a day to using the special oven dug in the ground.  The Jews were ordered to leave Egypt immediately.  They carried their unleavened dough in wooden boxes, as done in Egypt, and had to eat their bread barely leavened.  The shepherds in the fields in the Levant cook their own unleavened bread while at work.

Jesus said in the Lord prayer “Lord, give us our daily bread” The people in the Levant believe that their daily bread is not just from their labor; the Lord had participated from start to finish to offering the daily bread.  I cannot help but offer a current and political rapprochement: the successive US Administrations and the media “talking heads” would like us to believe that whatever prosperity is befalling other States it is simply because of US contributions; on the other hand, whatever calamities and miseries the world is suffering should not be laid on the USA: the USA does not bear any responsibility and should not be blamed.

It is the custom for a guest not to eat until he settles his recriminations with the host; thus bread and salt are the symbol of renewed friendship and loyalty.  The worst enemy is the one who shared your bread and salt and then shifted loyalty without any warning.  People never stepped on crumbs of bread (aysh meaning living); they pick up any bread off the ground, kiss it and then place it above ground level.

            When Gideon gathered his “large army” to fight the Midyanites, God ordered Gideon to select the soldiers that stooped in front of the stream and drank off the palm of their hands.  That was the custom of the noble citizens in the land; the common people knelt and drank directly off the stream.  Thus, Gideon ended up with 300 soldiers who were deemed courageous, sober, and worthy to fight.

On Handicapped persons: 

Handicapped individuals have a hard life in the Levant; they are nicknamed according to their handicaps; up very recently they were hidden from the public.  In Jesus travels handicapped individuals had hard time approaching Jesus; the crowd would prevent them from coming close because handicaps were considered punishment from God.  A handicapped woman got her courage and dared to touch the robe of Jesus and was cured.  Jesus told her: “Woman, it is your faith and not my cloth that cured you. Go in peace” Jesus was alluding to the custom that touching anything holy would cure or satisfy a want.

On Injustice:

Carrying the cross Jesus said “Sisters of Jerusalem, don’t cry over me.  Those who manhandled moist branches what they wouldn’t do with the dry ones?”  If the sacerdotal caste could sentence to death an innocent man then what you, sisters of Jerusalem, expect them to do with you and your children?  You should be starting to cry over your coming miseries and injustices.  Aphorisms on moist things versus dry ones, or bitter versus sweet tasty foods are many in the Levant.

On Animals:

Jesus warned Peter that he would repudiate him three times before the second crow of the coq.  There is a custom in the Levant when guest hear the second crow of the coq to start leaving.  The host has invariably to retort “You guys are mistaken, this is the first crow”. You may search Google for how many times a coq crows per day but in the Levant we maintain that coq crows at sun down, midnight and at dawn.

Jesus said about the surprise visit of death: “Stay awake; you don’t know when the Master of the house will show up; in the evening, at midnight or the last crow of the coq”.  The oriental Christian communities used the nights to pray and watch for the second coming of “Son of God”

Pigs are considered the dirtiest and lowest of animals.  When Jesus chased out the demons off a crazy man then the evil spirit entered pigs that rushed to the lake.  The younger son who asked for his inheritance ended up caring for pigs (the lowest job anyone could get) and could not even eat what the pigs ate though he loved “kharoub” which fills the stomach.

On Wheat Grinding: 

On the theme of sudden death Jesus recount another aphorism of the Land “Two of you are grinding wheat in a quern (hand mill), one is taken away and the other saved”.  It was the custom for two women friends to undertake the boring task of grinding wheat grain in two circular stone querns; a strong woman could do it alone but it is more fun to pass the time when two are chatting away.  Thus, you can never know when your closest friend will die.  Nowadays, in remote areas, the hand mill or “jaroush” is used to convert wheat grains into crushed wheat which is a staple ingredient to many traditional dishes like “tabouli”, “kebeh, and countless varieties.

 

On Revelations: 

Revelations abound in the Bible to the prophets, Elizabeth, Marie, and many times to Joseph who obeyed and executed the orders promptly.  Revelations are common phenomenon in the Levant.  A family would pay visits to shrines dedicated to a saint for fertility or for kinds of handicaps; the family would stay at the shrine praying and fasting as many nights as necessary until a revelation related to their wishes descends.  The families visit shrines confident that their “demands” would be exhausted.

For example, Hanna, the mother of the Virgin Marie had a revelation that she would be pregnant, so had Elizabeth (Alisabat), the sister of Hanna, who begot John the Baptist, so had Marie who gave birth to Jesus, so did the mother of Melki Sadek, the highest priest of the Land and King of Jerusalem to whom Abraham paid the teethe (tenth of income) as did Isaac and then Jacob, so did the mother of Samuel (Name of El), so had the mother of Jeremiah (Aramia) and countless others.

Those mothers vowed (nazer) their offspring to monasteries that were common in Phoenicia and Galilee.  The offspring who stayed in these monasteries for a large part of their youth were called Nazereen.  Jesus stayed in the monastery of Mount Carmel and administered by the Esseneans, adjacent to the Great Temple, from age 6 until he was in the age of aiding the family earning a living.  That is why Jesus was said to be a Nazarenos or who lived in the region of Galilee of the Nazarenes.  The town of Nazareth did not exist until the second century after Christ and Jesus roamed Lebanon, the ten main cities in Syria and Jordan (Decapolis) while preparing his disciples to spread his message.

On Shepherding and Faith

            Jesus said “I am the good shepherd who is ready to sacrifice for his sheep”. The shepherding was the oldest and most common job in the Levant and people learned leadership, and enjoyed freedom and solitude.  The shepherd, during the extended dry season, would lead his flock “the blessed ones” to the upper lands for grazing by mid March as the sheep or goat gave birth.  The shepherd would carry the new born and the mothers would follow him, confident in her shepherd.  The shepherd would arrange a stockade (hazeera) of stones about 5 feet high and top it with brambles and sleep at the entrance in a makeshift tent with his dog. “The truth is anyone who does not enter the stockade by the entrance is a thief; the shepherd enters from the door and the sheep hear his voice and their names and they go out to graze” because the stockade could be climbed with minor scratches. By mid October, the shepherd dismantles his stockade and moves his flock to lower altitudes where the sheep are horded in a one room basement (mrah) with no windows; Isaiah said: “My residence was dismantled and taken away from me as the shepherd tent”

            Shepherding requires skills in tight passageway amid the orchards that were not usually fenced.  The shepherd had to pay for whatever the sheep ate if he was unable to control his flock; the town people would not let the shepherd cross the village if they could not trust his guiding skills.  The flock trusted the shepherd because he would ward off wolves and hyenas and even follow the scavenger to its lair to retrieve the sheep or part of it and return it to the flock if alive. Jesus said: “A shepherd would leave his flock to go after the lost sheep”. The flock is not afraid of narrow hazardous paths taken by the shepherd “the shadow of death valley” because it trusts its leader.

 

Grape vines:

When Jesus mentions “The product of grape vine” is meant wine; though grapes were customarily dried (zabeeb) in abundance.  Kids would always carry handful of raisins in their oversized pockets as sweet and also to bribe other children; when long caravans of camels arrive at the market place, kids would bribe the conductors with raisins for a ride to the wells.  Women would get frustrated because camels drank most of the well and the women had to dip their buckets far deeper.  Grape vines were used as aphorism such as “I am the vine and you are its branches” or “Your wife is like a fecund vine around your house. Your sons like olive trees around your dinner table”.  The Prophet Micah said “They will sit under the vine and the fig tree and nothing will scare them”

The ceremonies of grape pressing by men’ and boys’ feet lasted days and nights until the juices were flowed to special receptacles of stones and clay. The press was made of a large stone vat set up on the roof of the house with a certain incline for the flow of the juice. The settled grape juice (rawook) was drunk by the poor people who could not afford wine “the (poor) pressed and felt thirsty”.  The rawook would then be boiled at various degrees; sour wine was preferred by men but sweet wine needed high boiling temperature because preferred by women. When the juice was destined to prepare molasses “debs” then white clay was added to the grapes before pressing for more efficient filtering of organic components.  Isaiah (Ashaya) said “Why your robe is reddish and your cloth looking as you were pressing grapes?”

Nowadays, the national drink is arak or ouzou in Greece and it is basically the condensation of the boiled grape juice through alembics; it is called “mtalat” when the process of condensation is performed three times for a content 97% alcoholic.

Gideon wanted to avoid paying tax on his wheat harvest.  The grape was not ripe yet and thus, Gideon used the top of his house to beat the wheat where grapes were pressed by feet though it was not yet the season of grape pressing.  He was hoping that the Midyanites would not discover his subterfuge.

 

The Roof Tops:

            The houses in the Levant used to be of just one large room where the entire family slept and ate in the winter season; the adjacent split room or a basement sheltered the chicken, goats, cows, or donkey.  The rest of the dry seasons that extended for over 7 months the main meeting place was the roof top; a makeshift tent of dangling grape vines and dry branches, and called “alyyeh”.  The roof was built with supporting tree trunks at three feet intervals and cross branches with no gaps and then 12 inches of dirt rolled over by a cylindrical stone at every season.  Official announcements or the arrival of caravans or any kind of major warnings such as the voices of field keepers (natour) were done by climbing a roof. Jesus advised his disciple to announce the Good News from the roof tops so that every one should hear the message clear and sound; that is what Peter did.  Families would go up to the roof tops to pray and cry and the new comer Hebrews didn’t like this custom of the Land.

When a paraplegic was dangled from a roof top for Jesus to heal the friends dug out the dirt and removed a few branches and made enough space (kofaa) then placed the sick man on a blanket with the four corners attached to a rope.

           

            At the Last Supper, Jesus and his disciples are eating on the roof top of a house, the “alyyat”; the family gathers in that shed during the hot seasons that extend for seven months from Mid May to mid September. Jesus and the disciples are sitting in a circle around several large platters of various dishes; everyone extends his hand to dip his piece of bread in the platter of his liking; there are no spoons or forks.  The scene is not as represented by Leonardo Da Vinci in the customs of Florence.  A server pour the wine in a single cup, starting by the most ranked in the gathering.  Before drinking the cup in one shot the guest wishes long life to his friends and ask them to remember him if he is about to leave them for an extended trip; then he selects the next guest to drink and the server pour wine for the selected person and in the same single cup. After supper, the cup is passed around and everyone takes just a sip.  Jesus said “I longed so much to eat this supper with you before I suffer”

            Jesus said: “The first one to dip his bread in my platter will deliver me tonight” was confusing to the disciples because they all dipped in Jesus’ platter one time or another. Judas was always the second in command and must have arranged to have his favorite platter close to him and Jesus for easy access; thus, Judas was the most plausible one to first dip his bread in Jesus platter. Young John loved Jesus and expressed his feeling as to the customs of the Levant by reclining his head on Jesus’ shoulder.  Jesus adhered to the customs of eating supper and his salutes about eating his flesh or drinking his blood in remembrance of him had a spiritual undertone and suggesting that he was to leave his disciples for good.  Jesus dipped a piece of bread in a platter and specifically offered it to Judas as a symbol of friendship no matter what is in Judas’ heart and mind. Jesus presented the box of money to Judas, the treasurer, as a sign that nothing is changed in Jesus faith to Judas loyalty in matter of financial transactions. Anyway, Judas was from a rich family and didn’t need small changes.

            In the garden of Gethsemane Jesus expresses his feelings of sorrows and pains as a Levantine; he lets his feelings pour out and wants his closest friends to share his feelings.  Three times he invites Peter and the sons of Zebedeh to keep the wake with him because “my soul is sad to death”.  Jesus was praying with such earnestness that his “sweating was of blood”. Jesus had no choice but to obey his father and urged God “Father, if it were possible to take away this biter cup, but it is not as I wish but as you want”

            Judas approached Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane and kissed him several times on the cheeks. Judas was thus telling Jesus, according to the Levant customs, that as of this instant they are on a par in ranks and that Judas decided that he no longer considers Jesus as the Messiah. Some one of a lower rank would shake hands and fake to kiss the right hand and the higher ranked person would fake a kiss on the cheek. Judas was using a custom for greetings that could also be used as a sign for the soldiers to get hold of the leader.

 

On Obeying Parents:

Obeying parents is not just a filial feeling in the Levant but a religious duty.  The command is “Obey your mother and father” and God punished Adam for simply disobeying him, period.  The story of Luc when Jesus, aged 12 then, was found discussing among the priests in the Temple as the clan went on pilgrimage is revealing. Jesus had priority of which parents to obey first: he reminded his parents that he has a duty to obey his God El first.  In the Levant, no family starts or leaves on a trip before counting and making sure of the presence of all the members of the family.  After the count, Jesus decided to return to the Temple. After the count, his family didn’t worry about Jesus because he was supposed to be amid the wider clan of relatives and because the Great Temple on Mount Carmel (not Jerusalem) was a familiar visiting place and no more than half a day walk to “Bethlehem of Tyr or Efrateh” where they lived, on the east side of Mount Carmel in Upper Galilee.  In none of the parables you find the eldest son depicted as the villain or disrespectful of traditions.  Eldest sons represent the fathers and the continuation of customs.

 

On Kingdom of Heaven

In the Levant we understand intuitively the figures of speech and parables that the West has hard time to comprehend; we understand and readily accept the meaning though it takes a life time to assimilate the true meaning.  Jesus said “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a person who is convinced that there is a treasure hidden in a piece of land. He gathers all his saving a buy the land” The predicators in the West would like to interpret this sentence as a gold or silver mine in the land that need to be excavated and they go at great length into legal terms to differentiate among the words “hidden and buried”.  The customs in our Land was to bury the jar of saved gold and silver coins in the garden or an unclaimed piece of land because the habitat was small (barely one large room where the entire household sleep and eat in) and could not sustain serious hiding places.  Tribes would hide their treasure in the desert before waging a battle and many would never survive to dig up their treasures.

            Thus, the individual who bought the land, if he were lucky would have to dig up most of the land anyway to find the jar of treasure.  The meaning is in order to reach the Kingdom of Heaven you would have to go through the same process of fulfilling a dream by investing money, time, and effort most of your life. Consequently, faith is a good starting point to sustain the duration of the long haul but it is not enough if you lack charity in your heart; you have to learn to care and love and support your brothers and neighbors. It is a hard and long endeavor to pass through the “hole of the needle“

            For example, many predicators in the west tried their best to explain the concept of “a hole in a needle” when Jesus said “It is easier for a camel to go through the hole of a needle than a rich person to go to heaven”.  The predicators in the west invented a more plausible and palatable explanation by saying that “the hole in the needle” was the small door in the huge gate reserved for the passage of individual; they said that a camel could pass through if not loaded with baggage; another nice figure of speech though not correct. In the languages of the Land, Arabic, Aramaic, or Hebrew the names of the small doors in gates were never called by anything referring to needle. The language in the Levant is extravagant for describing the almost impossible tasks that require perseverance and ingenuity.

 

            Jesus goes on: “Kingdom of heaven is like a land that was sawn with good grains of wheat.  At night, an enemy comes and saw “zouan” (a grain that resembles wheat but causes pain, dizziness, and suffering for many days when mixed with wheat grains; it is mostly used to feed chicken).  The cultivators (slaves) asked the master permission to sort out and pull out the “zouan” from the field. The master said that it is useless since the whole field is ruined” In dire periods of famine many would mix “zouan” with wheat to make profit regardless of the consequences.  The honest master would not take the chance of being perceived as a fraud if his good grain was inadvertently adulterated with “zouan”.  In another verse, Jesus told the servants to patiently and meticulously remove the “zouan” from the wheat then gather around a bonfire to burn the “zouan”

 

            The same idea relates with leaven that was saved in a bag of wheat in order not to rot quickly; in another verse in order to leaven the entire bag of wheat flour.  In ancient periods, people would eat unleavened bread because it was very hard and difficult to keep usable leaven in hot and desert regions.  Thus, leaven had the bad connotation of spoilage agent, such as when Jesus warned his disciples “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees” but the disciples didn’t understand this figure of speech: they lived at an advanced and urban period when leaven was no longer associated with spoilage but as a good catalyst.  Consequently, the parable of Jesus “Kingdom of Heaven is like a leaven that a woman hide in three bags of wheat flour until all the bags were leavened and ready to bake refers to the good use of small quantities to affect large lots.  Thus, a term could be used to convey contradictory meaning if we are not conversant with the customs and period of the saying.  In the Levant, cultivators believe that “zouan” will grow among wheat no mater how careful we proceed in sawing fields. Consequently, it is advisable to rotate the field to grow other kinds of harvests in order to have the opportunity to pull out all the “zouan” that spoiled the field for later wheat harvests.

           

            Jesus said “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a woman who had misplaced one of her ten coins.  She searches all nights and all days (when the husband is not home), she searches in every nook and cranny and she sweep the floor until she finds the missing coin.  Then this woman would call up her neighboring women friends to join her and celebrate” (Most of the time they spend more on these gathering than what the coin was worth).  People worked hard to earn a coin and the man of the house would invariable express his displeasure for a missing coin and every women had gone through the same experience many times in their lives and it was a real occasion for women to gather, recount, and recall their daily troubles.  There are times for anxiety and relentless searches and times for relaxation and sharing.  There are moments for prioritizing our quests and leaving many tasks undone to focus on an urgent one, such as saving our soul in order not to anger our Lord.  This story is almost identical in meaning as the shepherd who leaves 99 head of sheep grazing unattended in order to find the lost one.

 

On Women:

            Regardless of exterior behaviors of “non-polite” communication with women, men have utmost respect and considerations for their wives and sisters and girls. Inside the homes the couples are at par in responsibilities and duties if not biased toward the wives; “When there is love affectation is redundant”.  In that spirit, it is the good intensions that count and not the actual behaviors.  The Levantine regards the expressions “If you please”, or “be kind enough” are superfluous because love and respect are natural and come with the territory.  This behavior is compatible with the simple and rough daily living; houses are simply furnished with the basic necessities and the entire family members sleep and eat in one room or two; there are no exclusive rooms or quarters for the grown ups; and thus privacy is not a priority.

            The tradition of nomadic tribes raiding sedentary affluent villages and taking women captives heightened the protective customs in the Levant and restricted women’s work within the villages.   Women were restrained from showing off and retorting vehemently in gatherings of men.  

            The attitude of men of adopting the two extreme behaviors of sanctifying women (horma) and occasional “contempt” might convey a feeling of disdain but it is basically a childish behavior coupled with lack of a cultural life that the harsh demands for survival do not reserve time for “luxury”.  The Hebraic laws considered women with no soul and thus could be transacted as chattel; this is not the case for the rest of the people of the Land; and thus this huge cultural difference between the Hebrew Mosaic traditions and the traditions in the Levant.

 

“Thus spoken God; they will come carrying the little girls over the shoulders.  Kings will be your vassals and queens will nurse you”  The custom of carrying kid girls over shoulders is widely practiced in the Levant; mother resumes her daily tasks while the kid girls sit on their shoulders while getting a hold on the head. The prophet Isaiah (Ashaya) speaks in imageries what the “noble” class in the Levant expects the common people to practice in their presence.

New Borns were wrapped like mummies; first they are washed with lukewarm water and their bodies rubbed with salt and then scented before a square piece of cloth join their arms by the side of the body and the legs stretched.  An unwanted baby or when someone is cursed the maxim says “You were not rubbed with salt when you were born”

On Feet:

            Feet were considered dirty because people went barefoot or wearing thongs at best. The same is true when John the Baptist said about the coming Messiah “I will be most honored if he permit me to untie his shoe lace” because feet were considered dirty parts of the body and stooping near feet is not acceptable and thus, the custom of sitting by the feet of a nobility is a mark of homage bestowed on him.  When the sister of Martha, Mary of Magdala, pours expensive perfumes on Jesus’ feet and rubbed them with her hair she was expressing her complete humiliation and attesting to the Messiah status of Jesus. 

Note 4:  I have published five posts on the theme of customs and tradition in the Near East extracted from the Bibles, Old and New, with some development and clarifications to the benefit of the western civilizations. This post is a compilation of my previous posts.

 Note 5: This series of posts was inspired by the book that I reviewed “The Syrian Christ” by Abraham Metrie Rihbany; it was published in the USA and in English in 1916 and I read the Arabic translation.  I thought that it was a good idea to attach relevant contexts to the fragment of verses that Western predicators are found of using on the ground that abstract concepts don’t need any historical, geographic, or people’s customs context.

 

Note 6: The people in the Levant are people of faith; they refrain from rationally structuring their religion into dogma.  The early Christian communities relied on the custom of brotherhood and faith in the community. It is only when Christian communities were established in Greece and Rome that structuring got underway.  Hundreds of Christian sects mushroomed in the Levant according to a few alterations in the re-structuring of the dogma that spanned into political and self autonomous sects. 

            After the conclave of Nicee (Turkey) in 325, during the pagan Emperor Constantine, the Church got highly structured and hierarchical; the pagan ceremonies, symbols, and pageantry were introduced to win over the pagans who were in the majority.  Since then, persecution of the “heretic” Christian sects started and is still alive into modern time.

Note 7:  I am no theologian, and frankly, I don’t feel hot for any structured and formalized religions.  I am a guy who is appalled by sects abusing religion for political ends, for institutional profit, and for personal aggrandizement.  Occasionally, a few books of historical nature in matter of religion drop into my hands and they expose a few lethal fallacies; I have no choice but to react, expose the confusion related to abstract concepts out of their historical, geographical, and cultural context.  I cannot withstand sects that abolish individual reflection for the benefit of the “collectivity” or their close knit communities. I disseminate what my personal reflections feel right to inform and educate.